home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 3595 
 George to All 
 Re: Plus 4 rom error - is there any plac 
 15 Nov 21 22:22:19 
 
INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3
REPLYADDR gh424NO584SPAM@cox.net
REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP
MSGID: <20211116-042219.456.0@George.ssl-us.astraweb.com> 3b10faab
REPLY: <20211115-155041.792.0@George.ssl-us.astraweb.com> 12a1d73e
PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
Steven Combs sent me a copy of the Term-80 terminal program, the Plus/4
version, which works well on the Plus/4.  I have nothing to test it on, but
was able to examine the .PRG file, and found that the author uses his own
IRQ code for handling the 6551.  So that's a case where the rom error would
never come into play because the author uses his own replacement code
instead of the rom code.  He does that by hijacking the IRQ ram vector at
$0314.

I've asked Steven to send me Plus/4 terminal software that doesn't work so
well.  Maybe we can find one that doesn't bring in new ACIA handler code,
and we can see if any errors match the expected doubling of non-null
characters that the rom error should produce.  Then if he can arrange to
flash a new eprom containg the fix, we can see if performance is improved.

Here's Steven's video on the Plus/4 6551:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daoAllAv9qo
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/131 129/305
SEEN-BY: 153/250 757 154/10 218/700 840 220/70 221/1 6 226/17 30 227/114
SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 428 664 700 240/1120 5832 249/1 206 317 400 261/38
SEEN-BY: 267/800 282/1038 301/1 113 317/3 322/757 335/364 340/1000
SEEN-BY: 341/66 342/200 633/280 712/848 770/1 3 100 340 772/210 220
SEEN-BY: 772/230 920/1 4500/1 5058/104
PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca