Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1434  |
|  Mortar M. to Don Vally  |
|  age required for classic  |
|  09 Apr 25 14:56:53  |
 TZUTC: -0500 MSGID: 1199.fido_classicc@1:124/5016 2c5c0bb4 REPLY: 32.fidonet_classic_computer@1:135/363 2c5bd1bb PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/7dd9d919a Apr 07 2025 GCC 13.3.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.24-Linux master/7dd9d919a Apr 07 2025 GCC 13.3.0 BBSID: EOTLBBS CHRS: ASCII 1 NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105 Re: age required for classic By: Don Vally to GRANT WEASNER on Wed Apr 09 2025 12:08:59 > ...;my first x86 series was an XT-Clone. A Packard Bell 4/8Mhz (Turbo-Wow!) > CGA system. That was my first experience with x-86 architecture. I > personally consider those models too - "un-uniform" to be fun to use. I know > I may be in the minority, but you had to fight to get them to do what you > wanted. Packard Hell's were horrible. Servicing was a headache as they used proprietary parts. They were cheap (which made them popular with the ignorant Joe Public) and louse performers. My Bro-inlaw asked my advice years ago on what PC to get, I told him, "Anything but Packard Bell". Guess what he bought? Why? "It was cheap." I rest my case. --- SBBSecho 3.24-Linux * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016) SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 18/200 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/0 5016 SEEN-BY: 128/187 129/305 153/7715 154/10 110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 SEEN-BY: 218/700 810 840 850 860 880 900 910 226/30 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/111 114 206 275 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 705 SEEN-BY: 266/512 291/111 292/854 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35 PATH: 124/5016 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]