Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 759  |
|  Daniel to Ron Lauzon  |
|  Re: computer chronicles:  |
|  27 Apr 20 15:19:00  |
 TZUTC: -0700 MSGID: 697.fido_classicc@1:340/7 230c9d71 REPLY: 688.fidoclassicc@1:275/89 230c563c PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Win32 Apr 25 2020 MSC 1925 TID: SBBSecho 3.10-Win32 r3.160 Apr 25 2020 MSC 1925 CHRS: ASCII 1 -=> Ron Lauzon wrote to Daniel <=- -=> Daniel wrote to August Abolins <=- Da> Even into the late 90s, it was the provider's liability if users did Da> illegal activity using their systems. Sysops were forced to monitor Da> user activity on their bbs's. My sysop watched everything I did. Sort Da> of creepy. Less than a year ago, congress was threatening facebook adn Da> all the other providers with taking the legislation away. The speaker Da> said they were taking advantage of the law and it can be taken away. I Da> thought it was funny as if she was sitting on top fo the government and Da> was holding all the power. That threat fell flat. But anyway, the late Da> 90s gave the provider relief from this liability. RL> The law you are referring to was based on the argument that, "If we RL> need to vet everything everyone says on our systems, we can't run our RL> systems and people lose a way to communicate." So the gov't basically RL> extended a right already given to the phone company. If someone RL> commits a crime via the phone, the phone company cannot be held RL> responsible because they are neutral 3rd party - or in the case of this RL> law, a "platform" for communication. RL> But then the big Leftie companies started suppressing non-Leftie RL> communication. RL> Some people said "Hey! Wait a minute! You said that you couldn't do RL> that and run your systems. So, stop suppressing speech or we will RL> revoke your protection." RL> The big Leftie companies said "OK", but really didn't change much. RL> They just gave their speech suppression better sounding names. Like RL> "keeping misinformation down" or "cracking down on Hate Speech". Don't forget the buzzwords such as 'violent speech.' That's my favorite. I'm really torn though. These companies have tons of power but are also public companies. They're under no obligation to follow the constitutional free speech protections because they're not the government. Nor should they. On the other hand, their downfall will be the very act of censorship/discrimination that they practice. I'll defend their choice just as I defend the wedding cake baker who refuses to bake for gay weddings. While I think his religious justification was about as weak as the left's, it's his choice to limit the success of his business. So be it if he hates gay people. That's small fries compared to the list of whole groups the left hate. It's his choice to deny business to whomever he see's fit. What I don't like is how the press picks and chooses who they define as having a right to operate their business. If you're on the right, you have no right. If you're on the left, different story. It's disgusting that Alex Jones, a complete nutjob, has been silenced and de-platformed. I don't particularly like the guy and I don't listen to him, but I also don't agree with silencing him. The left has descended completely into a deeply fascist pattern from which Idoubt they'll ever recover. This is why I feel the democratic party is dead. I call them the democrat party now. In another thread, I said that their ethos is fragile. AOC is evidence of it. Her barside politics tore them to shreds and she didn't even try and she did in a year what people haven't done in a century. . ... Visit me at: gopher://gcpp.world --- MultiMail/Linux v0.49 * Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (1:340/7) SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/5 15/0 18/200 19/36 90/1 106/201 116/18 120/331 SEEN-BY: 120/340 601 123/140 128/2 153/7715 154/10 218/700 222/2 226/16 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/101 426 452 981 1014 230/150 152 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/1 206 317 400 250/1 261/38 100 266/512 267/155 SEEN-BY: 275/100 282/1031 1056 291/100 111 317/3 320/119 219 322/757 SEEN-BY: 340/400 341/66 342/13 200 396/45 633/0 267 280 281 384 408 SEEN-BY: 633/410 412 416 640/1321 1384 712/620 848 770/1 801/161 189 SEEN-BY: 2320/105 3634/12 5020/1042 5053/58 PATH: 340/7 400 261/38 712/848 633/280 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]