home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 767 
 Ron Lauzon to Daniel 
 Re: computer chronicles: 
 29 Apr 20 11:07:00 
 
TZUTC: -0400
MSGID: 696.fidoclassicc@1:275/89 230edbbe
REPLY: 697.fido_classicc@1:340/7 230c9d71
PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Win32  Apr 15 2020 MSC 1925
TID: SBBSecho 3.10-Win32 r3.159 Apr 15 2020 MSC 1925
CHRS: ASCII 1
-=> Daniel wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-

 Da> Don't forget the buzzwords such as 'violent speech.' That's my
 Da> favorite.

Oh, ya. "Hate speech".  Which we've found to really mean "speech we don't like"
or "speech that doesn't match our Narrative".

 Da> I'm really torn though. These companies have tons of power but are also
 Da> public companies. They're under no obligation to follow the
 Da> constitutional free speech protections because they're not the
 Da> government. Nor should they. On the other hand, their downfall will be
 Da> the very act of censorship/discrimination that they practice.

I completely agree.  But these companies want the best of both worlds.

On one hand, they want to be a platform (like the phone network) and not be
held responsible for what others post on their platform.  I get that.  I would
argue that companies like Facebook and YouTube wouldn't be able to exist if
they had to vet every post.

But on the other hand, they want the power to edit speech that they don't like.
 But that makes them a publisher and they **are** responsible for their content
on their platform.

They can't have it both ways.  The rules don't work like that.

If Facebook or YouTube want to deplatform/censor certain people, I'll agree
with that.  But then they lose their Section 230 protection and can be sued for
what other people post.

If they want that protection, that's fine too.  But they lose their ability to
silence people they don't like.

And remember, I'm not talking about Facebook or YouTube taking content down
because a court told them to do so.

 Da> This is why I feel the democratic party is dead. I call them the
 Da> democrat party now. In another thread, I said that their ethos is
 Da> fragile. AOC is evidence of it. Her barside politics tore them to
 Da> shreds and she didn't even try and she did in a year what people
 Da> haven't done in a century.

I agree.  The Democrat Party is gone.  Left in its place is the Socialist Party
because the people there have much more in common with socialists.

... 20 Dumb Blonds in freezer:  Frosted flakes.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
 * Origin: Diamond Mine Online BBS bbs.dmine.net:24 (1:275/89)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/5 15/0 18/200 19/36 90/1 106/201 116/18 120/331
SEEN-BY: 120/340 601 123/140 128/2 153/7715 154/10 218/700 222/2 226/16
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/101 426 452 664 981 1014 230/150 152 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/1 206 317 400 250/1 261/38 100 266/512 267/155
SEEN-BY: 275/100 282/1031 1056 291/100 111 317/3 320/119 219 322/757
SEEN-BY: 340/400 341/66 342/13 200 396/45 633/0 267 280 281 384 408
SEEN-BY: 633/410 412 416 640/1321 1384 712/620 848 770/1 801/161 189
SEEN-BY: 2320/105 3634/12 5020/1042 5053/58
PATH: 275/89 100 261/38 712/848 633/280 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca