XPost: alt.education, boulder.general, co.cos.general   
   XPost: co.politics, misc.legal   
   From: theprof@jonez.net   
      
   "krp"  wrote in message   
   news:V%GBl.1549$Q52.1260@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...   
   >   
   >  wrote in message   
   > news:a6fc6a23-031b-4f7a-9d76-400f35d123b9@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >> krp wrote:   
   >>> "_ Prof. Jonez _"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:73nji3Fuue36U1@mid.individual.net...   
   >>> >   
   >>> > "krp"  wrote in message   
   >>> > news:L2tBl.1302$Q52.376@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...   
   >>> >>   
   >>> >> "_ Prof. Jonez _"  wrote in message   
   >>> >> news:73n0c8Fvuo7nU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >>> >>>   
   >>> >>> "krp"  wrote in message   
   >>> >>> news:PDkBl.1276$6n.1009@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...   
   >>> >>>>   
   >>> >>>> "Matt"  wrote in message   
   >>> >>>> news:f98d6881-4278-4535-ba4e-070bf3b7af73@a7g2000yqk.go   
   glegroups.com...   
   >>> >>>> On Apr 2, 4:26 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _"  wrote:   
   >>> >>>>> Churchill wins civil case   
   >>> >>>>>   
   >>> >>>>> By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post   
   >>> >>>>>   
   >>> >>>>> Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT   
   >>> >>>>>   
   >>> >>>>> Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today   
   >>> >>>>> as a Denver   
   >>> >>>>> jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his   
   >>> >>>>> controversial essay   
   >>> >>>>> on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.   
   >>> >>>>> Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the   
   >>> >>>>> former   
   >>> >>>>> professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may   
   >>> >>>>> have   
   >>> >>>>> worked at CU in a separate hearing.   
   >>> >>>>   
   >>> >>>> Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he   
   >>> >>>> was clearly   
   >>> >>>> in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person   
   >>> >>>> suing or not.   
   >>> >>>>   
   >>> >>>> HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic   
   >>> >>>> fraud?   
   >>> >>>   
   >>> >>> Prove it, scumbag.   
   >>> >>   
   >>> >> Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question   
   >>> >> if for Damages they could award "NONE"?   
   >>> >   
   >>> > Juror speaks out   
   >>> >   
   >>> > Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict   
   >>> > Thursday, and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.   
   >>> >   
   >>> > But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis   
   >>> > and Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the   
   >>> > $1 award wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.   
   >>>   
   >>> ONE JUROR OF 12.   
   >>   
   >> Damn dude, you right wing trash sure want to argue but sure cannot   
   >> 'bother yourselves' to actually think.   
   >   
   > Did you MISS that other Juror(S) said they wanted to award him NOTHING????   
      
   You really are dumber than a bucket of dirt, aren't you Ken?   
      
   There were 6 jurors.   
      
   Five wanted to award Dr. Churchill big $$ but since Churchill didn't   
   ask for $$, nor supply the Jury with any method or formula to calculate   
   damages, they awarded the $1.   
      
      
   > They were told that IF they didn't award him anything, then how much $$$$$$$   
   > would be up to the judge.   
      
   More complete bullshit from the shiteating bullshitter.   
      
      
   > So the judged ALL the merits to Churchill's claims and Awarded him ONE   
   DOLLAR.   
      
   In damages.   
      
   CU will now be forced to pay HUNDRED of THOUSANDS of $$ to David Lane for   
   his legal fees prosecuting the case.   
      
   CU will now be forced to pay Dr. Ward Churchill $96,000.00 / year whether he   
   teaches   
   there or not.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)