5f9cbfa3   
   XPost: alt.politics.conservative, alt.politics.republicans, alt.   
   olitics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.republican   
   From: xxxrayted@aol.com   
      
   In article   
   ,   
    chatnoir wrote:   
      
   > >   
   > > > > > > And just what does this have to do with the granny case???   
   > >   
   > > > > > Same!!! Same!!!   
   > >   
   > > > > It is??? One case involves a person fearing for her safety and legally   
   > > > > permitted by the state to use deadly force, over another case where a   
   > > > > person drifted off their property and shot somebody who was not a   
   threat   
   > > > > to them. Besides the use of a firearm, what is same about these two   
   > > > > stories?   
   > >   
   > > > Make my day law in Texas - Just what you all argue for!   
   > >   
   > > It's exactly what we argue for. It's too bad we don't have such laws in   
   > > my state. However, crime has gotten so bad that they did pass a Castle   
   > > Doctrine because criminals were breaking into peoples homes while they   
   > > slept. Today, if anybody walks in your home uninvited, BOOM! And there   
   > > is nothing the law can do to you.    
   > >   
   >   
   > In Colorado, you can shoot someone who breaks in your house and   
   > threatens you! I don't think many people would wait in Colorado to   
   > see what type of threat someone breaking in your house is showing!   
   >   
   > In Colorado Springs, a drunken man mistook his house for another and   
   > was banging on the house to get in! The owner of the house whose dorr   
   > was being banged on, shot the man through the door and killed the   
   > man! He was not charged for that shooting! So, it is not like   
   > someone can come in your yard or house and has a gun shooting at you   
   > before you can act!   
      
   Before the Castle Doctrine here in Ohio, if somebody broke into your   
   house, and you had an option of leaving the house because you were near   
   a door, but opted to shoot the guy instead, they would bring you up on   
   charges. If found guilty, the family of the person you shot could sue   
   you besides. Same held true if somebody broke into your house and you   
   weren't home, and he tripped on a throw rug and hurt himself. The   
   burglar could hold you liable for his injuries.   
      
   They changed the laws here because too many innocent people were being   
   victimized by the bad guys and the good guys. Depending where you   
   lived, you were afraid to keep your door unlocked on those wonderful   
   summer nights. Now if somebody walks or breaks into your home armed or   
   not, you have every right to shoot and kill that person.   
      
   --   
   Barock Insane Obama: The greatest joke America ever played on itself.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|