XPost: alt.politics.conservative, alt.politics.republicans, alt.   
   olitics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.republican, alt.politics.usa.misc, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: us.politics, talk.politics.usa   
   From: linder.one@osu.edu   
      
   RichTravsky  wrote:   
      
   >Sarah Austin wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Wilson Woods   wrote :   
   >>   
   >> > Preventing school principals from forcing their religious views on   
   >> > others is not forcing them to do anything - it's preventing them from   
   >> > doing something.   
   >>   
   >> Free speech isnt "forcing one's views" on anyone, as long as it's not done   
   >> on someone else's private property when they dont want it done.   
   >>   
   >> IOW you cant come preach religion in my living room, free speech doesnt   
   >> apply on my private property.   
   >>   
   >> It SHOULD however apply on all government property and streets.   
   >   
   >Organized religious activities on government property constitutes endorsement   
   >and hence violates the Constitution.   
      
   Government property or public property?  They aren't synonymous.   
      
   JSL   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)