home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   co.general      More than just amusing South Park antics      76,942 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 75,177 of 76,942   
   Clairbear to RichTravsky   
   Re: Can you be jailed for saying grace?   
   06 Sep 09 18:41:46   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.conservative, alt.politics.republicans, alt.   
   olitics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.republican, alt.politics.usa.misc, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: us.politics, talk.politics.usa   
   From: clair@Verizon.net   
      
   RichTravsky  wrote in   
   news:4AA33B8B.4DE38EE3@hotmMOVEail.com:   
      
   > Jeffrey Scott Linder wrote:   
   >>   
   >> RichTravsky  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >Jeffrey Scott Linder wrote:   
   >> >> RichTravsky  wrote:   
   >> >> >Jeffrey Scott Linder wrote:   
   >> >> >> RichTravsky  wrote:   
   >> >> >> >SageRider wrote:   
   >> >> >> >> Wilson Woods wrote:   
   >> >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> >> > You fucking right-wingers just need to let go of prayer in   
   >> >> >> >> > school.  Stop mixing church and state.  If you want to   
   >> >> >> >> > pray, do it someplace else.  No one is telling you, or   
   >> >> >> >> > getting ready to tell you, that you can't go to   
   >> >> >> >> > church or pray in your home.  Keep it the fuck out of   
   >> >> >> >> > public school, period.   
   >> >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> >> The Constitution guarantees us freedom of religion, and   
   >> >> >> >> equal protection under the law.  Any access allowed on   
   >> >> >> >> public property to secular use, such as a booster banquet,   
   >> >> >> >> must extend on an equal basis to religion.   
   >> >> >> >   
   >> >> >> >Wrong.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> The Supreme Court disagrees with you.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Wrong. This was on school property.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> The case you are discussing does not apply to the principles being   
   >> >> discussed.  Do try to separate the two.   
   >> >   
   >> >The place this occurred directly applies to what is being discussed.   
   >> >Had they chosen non government property none of this would be   
   >> >happening. Do keep that in mind.   
   >>   
   >> As usual, you don't get it.   
   >   
   > What part of school property did you not understand?   
   >   
   What part of the first ammendment do YOU not understand?   
   Freedom OF speech  or freedom OF religion?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca