XPost: alt.politics.usa
From: clair@Verizon.net
Larry Hewitt wrote in
news:TeudnVrrfrLm2TnX4p2dnAA@comporium.net:
> Clairbear wrote:
>> RichTravsky wrote in
>> news:4AA33B8B.4DE38EE3@hotmMOVEail.com:
>>
>>> Jeffrey Scott Linder wrote:
>>>> RichTravsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jeffrey Scott Linder wrote:
>>>>>> RichTravsky wrote:
>>>>>>> Jeffrey Scott Linder wrote:
>>>>>>>> RichTravsky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> SageRider wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Wilson Woods wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You fucking right-wingers just need to let go of prayer in
>>>>>>>>>>> school. Stop mixing church and state. If you want to
>>>>>>>>>>> pray, do it someplace else. No one is telling you, or
>>>>>>>>>>> getting ready to tell you, that you can't go to
>>>>>>>>>>> church or pray in your home. Keep it the fuck out of
>>>>>>>>>>> public school, period.
>>>>>>>>>> The Constitution guarantees us freedom of religion, and
>>>>>>>>>> equal protection under the law. Any access allowed on
>>>>>>>>>> public property to secular use, such as a booster banquet,
>>>>>>>>>> must extend on an equal basis to religion.
>>>>>>>>> Wrong.
>>>>>>>> The Supreme Court disagrees with you.
>>>>>>> Wrong. This was on school property.
>>>>>> The case you are discussing does not apply to the principles
being
>>>>>> discussed. Do try to separate the two.
>>>>> The place this occurred directly applies to what is being
discussed.
>>>>> Had they chosen non government property none of this would be
>>>>> happening. Do keep that in mind.
>>>> As usual, you don't get it.
>>> What part of school property did you not understand?
>>>
>> What part of the first ammendment do YOU not understand?
>> Freedom OF speech or freedom OF religion?
>
>
> You are the one lacking knowledge of the amendment.
>
> read it.
>
> Read the scotus rulings pertaining to it.
>
> Get a brain.
>
> Then get back to us/
>
> larry
>
Read it for yourself
Note I said read not redact(the lieberal way of seeing the truth)
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion
In other word no idividual religion is promoted over others
prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Meaning anyone can pray or voice their religion whenever and wherever
they desire
prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Meaning that I or anyone else can practice their beliefs without
government interference or the interference on lieberal atheist
toadies like you
abridging the freedom of speech
In other words as long as it is not a direct threat to you well being
I can say what I will,when I will,where I will
of the press
The Media is free to tell the truth whether YOU like it or not Even
if they do not agree with the policies of the current party in power
he right of the people peaceably to assemble
Note that one as you and other lieberals try to suppress the teaparty
protestors those who oppose Obamacare and even as the prior
administration respected the right to protest the war
to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
Here again the right to protest or request that the governmant take
action to provide for the general good
What part of that do your redacting,dissent suppressing,lieberal
blowhards not understand.
Rather than just trying to shout down those who belive in the
constitution, the real truth of it's words and the United States of
America why don't you just shut up until your hatred of the real America
and you mature enough to realize that modern liberalism is a philosophy
of hate and suppress of dissent
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
