XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   can.talk.guns   
   From: leg@sea   
      
   RD (The Sandman) wrote:   
   > Fiftycal  wrote in   
   > news:fac4d51602rkrugik1nf68r3cnuk4gs8qr@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:24:51 -0700 (PDT), Matt   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Oct 11, 1:04 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>> On Oct 11, 12:35 pm, Fiftycal  wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:26:59 -0700 (PDT), Matt   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> You're the moron. California registered guns and the   
   >>>>>>>> confiscated them.   
   >>>>>>> Of course they did. There are no guns in California.   
   >>>>>> Hey DICKHEAD, why don't you do a little research before you spout   
   >>>>>> your IGNORANCE.   
   >>>>> Not a SINGLE gun in California. And Mort told us.   
   >>>> He did?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Where?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Can you QUOTE him, Liar?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> We appreciate the information.   
   >>>>> No Guns. None. Not a one. Every single one confiscated.   
   >>>>> Gone.   
   >>>>> Matt   
   >>>> So where did he claim that?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Cite?   
   >>> Yep, no guns. All confiscated. And you agree with him.   
   >>>   
   >>> Glad to hear it, moron.   
   >>>   
   >>> Matt   
   >> Hey ASSHOLE, no one but you is claiming that.  Tell me, did you hear   
   >> about the same SCAM in New Yawk City?  First "mayor" Dinkins had   
   >> semi-autos REGISTERED and then had them CONFISCATED.  DO you DENY that   
   >> happened,"mayor queens'?   
   >>   
   >   
   > Excuse me, but what Matt is saying is that Mort didn't identify that it   
   > was assault weapons.   
      
   So???   
      
   > Mort simply said guns were registered and then   
   > confiscated.   
      
   As they were.   
      
   > One could believe from that that he meant all of the guns   
   > not just the assault weapons.   
      
   No, no one _reasonably_ could believe that.   
      
   But a fascist spinmeister will _always_ play semantics when it comes to   
   gun-grabbing rhetoric.   
      
   > I believe Matt is kinda teasing about the   
   > actual statement , not the sentiment.   
      
   Your belief is shit.   
      
   Matty is a long time gun-hater and a complete scumbag.   
      
   He poaches semantics because he is UN_able to argue the issue on its merits.   
      
   Why YOU, of all people, would make excuses for that bucket of fascist   
   barf is beyond comprehension.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)