4500a8a1   
   XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: leg@sea   
      
   Matt wrote:   
   > On Oct 20, 3:28 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >> Matt wrote:   
   >>> On Oct 20, 11:43 am, Fiftycal  wrote:   
   >>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Matt   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>> On Oct 19, 7:51 pm, Fiftycal  wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:09:32 -0700 (PDT), Matt   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Oct 19, 6:12 pm, LesClaypool  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2:48 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/2amteach/SOURCES.HTM   
   >>>>>>>>> Are you in the National Guard? No? No guns for you.   
   >>>>>>>> I don't need to be in the "National Guard" to have the right to keep   
   and   
   >>>>>>>> bear arms.   
   >>>>>>> Prove it.   
   >>>>>> We already did, you lying sack of shiite.  That you don't believe the   
   >>>>>> U.S. government is not our problem.  Prove he DOESN'T have a right to   
   >>>>>> keep and bear arms.   
   >>>>> Lack of proof noted.   
   >>>>> Matt   
   >>>> Here go loony, get someone to read and understand it for you.   
   >>> What, pray tell, does that have   
   >> You were PUNKED again Matty, you cheap gutter slut.   
   >   
   > Yep,   
      
   Yep, you useless dried up cunt.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)