2c70c6b9   
   XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: leg@sea   
      
   Matt wrote:   
   > On Oct 31, 12:09 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >> Matt wrote:   
   >>> On Oct 31, 10:58 am, "RD (The Sandman)" >> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>> Matt  wrote innews:e5c6e48b-b2b6-4b   
   8-b0cd-519bf40a4191@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>>> On Oct 30, 2:34 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>> "leg@sea"  wrote innews:hcfe6s$aeg$1@news.eternal-   
   >>>>>> september.org:   
   >>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Oct 29, 8:29 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 28, 7:09 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Matt Telles felches spaniels in the break room.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Blah blah blah, Spammy is the 12 year old that rapes little   
   >>>>>>>>>> boys. Point proven.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Matt   
   >>>>>>>>> How's life by the reservoir, shall we up the ante?   
   >>>>>>>> Wow, you mean you are going to reveal my (*gasp*) name and   
   >>>>>>>> address, Spammy? Gee, anyone with a PHONE BOOK can do that.   
   >>>>>>> I _sure hope_ none of those 'crazed' gun owners you're always   
   >>>>>>> trying to disenfranchise finds there was over to Lakewood,   
   >>>>>>> Colorado, Matty...   
   >>>>>> They probably won't pay any attention to his address.....after all,   
   >>>>>> the vast majority of them are adult enough to realize that   
   >>>>>> differences of opinion exist....and always will.   
   >>>>>>>> Done raping the 12 year old boys, Spammy?   
   >>>>>>> Done trying to take away peoples' rights to own guns Matty?   
   >>>>>> He hasn't tried to take mine away.....or yours if you have one.  He   
   >>>>>> simply has different ideas on gun control.   
   >>>>> Eh, Spammy and I go way back to his Uncle Sam days on co.general.   
   >>>>> Allegedly, he lives here. He doesn't like being shown up.   
   >>>>> As for gun control, I do have different ideas. I think that what works   
   >>>>> in   
   >>>>> one place won't work in another. In other words, I like the concept of   
   >>>>> local control over matters. Does anyone truly disagree?   
   >>>> Yep.  I believe in state control but not city by city.  Why should   
   >>>> someone doing something perfectly legal where he lives be thrown in jail   
   >>>> while seeing his brother a few blocks over?   
   >>> My easy answers to that would be the states of NY, CA and TX.   
   >>> Consider:   
   >>> Upstate NY is generally rural, very few very large cities,   
   >>> considerable wild life,   
   >>> no urban areas at all to speak of. Downstate, on the other hand, is   
   >>>   
   >  mostly   
   >>> urban. Do you think the same rules would apply to both?   
   >> Does a 4 wheel drive vehicle work as well in either?   
   >   
   > No.   
      
   Oh?   
      
   Less roads?   
      
   >   
   >> How about a nail gun?   
   >   
   > No.   
      
   Oh, less lumber?   
      
      
   > Obviously, you are too stupid   
      
   You need your lying, fucking, gun-grabbing face mashed in Matty, want to   
   get together and work on that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)