XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: leg@sea   
      
   Scout wrote:   
   > leg@sea wrote:   
   >> Scout wrote:   
   >>> RD (The Sandman) wrote:   
   >>>> "leg@sea"  wrote in   
   >>>> news:hchrio$c9t$10@news.eternal-september.org:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Oct 30, 2:34 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "leg@sea"  wrote innews:hcfe6s$aeg$1@news.eternal-   
   >>>>>>> september.org:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Oct 29, 8:29 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 28, 7:09 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Telles felches spaniels in the break room.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Blah blah blah, Spammy is the 12 year old that rapes little   
   >>>>>>>>>>> boys. Point proven.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Matt   
   >>>>>>>>>> How's life by the reservoir, shall we up the ante?   
   >>>>>>>>> Wow, you mean you are going to reveal my (*gasp*) name and   
   >>>>>>>>> address, Spammy? Gee, anyone with a PHONE BOOK can do that.   
   >>>>>>>> I _sure hope_ none of those 'crazed' gun owners you're always   
   >>>>>>>> trying to disenfranchise finds there was over to Lakewood,   
   >>>>>>>> Colorado, Matty...   
   >>>>>>> They probably won't pay any attention to his address.....after   
   >>>>>>> all, the vast majority of them are adult enough to realize that   
   >>>>>>> differences of opinion exist....and always will.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Done raping the 12 year old boys, Spammy?   
   >>>>>>>> Done trying to take away peoples' rights to own guns Matty?   
   >>>>>>> He hasn't tried to take mine away.....or yours if you have one. He   
   >>>>>>> simply has different ideas on gun control.   
   >>>>>> Eh, Spammy and I go way back to his Uncle Sam days on co.general.   
   >>>>>> Allegedly, he lives here. He doesn't like being shown up.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> As for gun control, I do have different ideas. I think that what   
   >>>>>> works in   
   >>>>>> one place won't work in another. In other words, I like the   
   >>>>>> concept of local control over matters. Does anyone truly disagree?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Matt   
   >>>>> Why yes, the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION does.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You fucking piece of shit fascist gun-grabber.   
   >>>> We can hold the discussion without the name calling....it simply   
   >>>> makes you look like Lee Harrison or TMT or Lookout.   
   >>> True, you need to keep things civil and respectful for as long as   
   >>> you can, and should rarely be the one to start the name calling and   
   >>> then only when it can be justified. Such as informing a person who   
   >>> knowingly posts lies that they are a liar. In this case, legs needs   
   >>> to take a breath, sit back, calm down, and try it again from the   
   >>> top. Maybe refering the 14th Amendment and asking him why he thinks   
   >>> the 2nd shouldn't be applied as a restraint upon the power of the   
   >>> state/local governments to infringe upon our right to keep and bear   
   >>> arms. Possibly even pointing out examples of why they also shouldn't   
   >>> be allowed to violate our freedom of speech, press, religon,   
   >>> unreasonable search, ect. And even then even if he agrees the 2nd via the   
   >>> 14th would disallow   
   >>> this, he may still feel they should be able to do so. At which point   
   >>> you need to ask him to explain why he feels they should be able to.   
   >>> If he comes back with anything other than "because", then you have   
   >>> more to work with. Typically the worst thing you can do for an   
   >>> anti-gunner is to allow him to talk. They will typically end up   
   >>> sinking themselves and showing they lack any objective logical   
   >>> reason for their opinion. In short, keep handing him rope until he hangs   
   >>> himself.   
   >> Been there done that, played the game with Matty so many times it   
   >> frankly bores me to tears.   
   >   
   > Then may I offer a suggestion. If you no longer wish to deal with him. Then   
   > don't. Either ignore his messages, or simply kill file him outright.   
      
   Nope.   
      
   Kill files are for cowards.   
      
   I'm inviting the SOB to meet me at a local boxing gym, whereupon I will   
   fuck his face up.   
      
   Matty?   
      
   You game?   
      
      
   >> Now if you've the energy and derive satisfaction from the exercise,   
   >> why have at.   
   >   
   > Typically, I end up ignoring those that are IMO empty trolls who are simply   
   > trying to stir the pot and their only objective is to see how much they can   
   > lower the level of the debate, if they can get it to the point of childish   
   > insults and so on, then they are happy as pigs in mud.   
   >   
   > I very rarely respond to Lee Harrison anymore, though some still use him to   
   > present their arugments.   
      
   The "lone" moron is subhuman filth - period.   
      
   You save yourself the disinfection.   
      
   >> For my part a simple 'taking out the trash' with him will suffice.   
   >   
   > I wouldn't disagree if you chose to ignore him.   
      
   I choose to invite the gutless puke to meet me in a boxing ring.   
      
   Matty, you tired old cunt, you listening?   
      
   I'll fuck your face up forever, you game?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)