2c70c6b9   
   XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   Matt wrote:   
   > On Oct 31, 12:09 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >> Matt wrote:   
   >>> On Oct 31, 10:58 am, "RD (The Sandman)" >> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>> Matt  wrote   
   >>>> innews:e5c6e48b-b2b6-4bb8-b0cd-519bf40a4191@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >>>>> On Oct 30, 2:34 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>> "leg@sea"  wrote innews:hcfe6s$aeg$1@news.eternal-   
   >>>>>> september.org:   
   >>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Oct 29, 8:29 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 28, 7:09 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Matt Telles felches spaniels in the break room.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Blah blah blah, Spammy is the 12 year old that rapes little   
   >>>>>>>>>> boys. Point proven.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Matt   
   >>>>>>>>> How's life by the reservoir, shall we up the ante?   
   >>>>>>>> Wow, you mean you are going to reveal my (*gasp*) name and   
   >>>>>>>> address, Spammy? Gee, anyone with a PHONE BOOK can do that.   
   >>>>>>> I _sure hope_ none of those 'crazed' gun owners you're always   
   >>>>>>> trying to disenfranchise finds there was over to Lakewood,   
   >>>>>>> Colorado, Matty...   
   >>>>>> They probably won't pay any attention to his address.....after   
   >>>>>> all, the vast majority of them are adult enough to realize that   
   >>>>>> differences of opinion exist....and always will.   
   >>>>>>>> Done raping the 12 year old boys, Spammy?   
   >>>>>>> Done trying to take away peoples' rights to own guns Matty?   
   >>>>>> He hasn't tried to take mine away.....or yours if you have one.   
   >>>>>> He simply has different ideas on gun control.   
   >>>>> Eh, Spammy and I go way back to his Uncle Sam days on co.general.   
   >>>>> Allegedly, he lives here. He doesn't like being shown up.   
   >>>>> As for gun control, I do have different ideas. I think that what   
   >>>>> works in   
   >>>>> one place won't work in another. In other words, I like the   
   >>>>> concept of local control over matters. Does anyone truly disagree?   
   >>>> Yep. I believe in state control but not city by city. Why should   
   >>>> someone doing something perfectly legal where he lives be thrown   
   >>>> in jail   
   >>>> while seeing his brother a few blocks over?   
   >>   
   >>> My easy answers to that would be the states of NY, CA and TX.   
   >>   
   >>> Consider:   
   >>   
   >>> Upstate NY is generally rural, very few very large cities,   
   >>> considerable wild life,   
   >>> no urban areas at all to speak of. Downstate, on the other hand, is   
   >>>   
   >  mostly   
   >>> urban. Do you think the same rules would apply to both?   
   >>   
   >> Does a 4 wheel drive vehicle work as well in either?   
   >   
   > No.   
      
   Really? What is it about a 4 wheel drive you think doesn't allow it to work   
   in a city?   
      
      
   >> How about a nail gun?   
   >   
   > No.   
      
   So why exactly do you think nail guns don't work as well in a city?   
      
      
   > Obviously, you are too stupid to understand much of anything. So, you   
   > expose your stupidity for all to see, Spammy.   
      
   Obviously you are unable to clearly communicate what it is you want, and you   
   seem to have all sorts of weird ideas about what will or wont work in a   
   city.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)