XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell
From: leg@sea
Lookout wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:04:52 -0800 (PST), Matt
> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 1, 12:19 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" > @comcast.net> wrote:
>>> Matt wrote innews:fa6cbdf8-5060-458
-91b4-c3fbb0e2ebe3@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 31, 12:32 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>> @comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>> Matt wrote
>>>>> innews:ff39ad91-8585-4434-a3ab-8d7cec
>>>> a38...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>> On Oct 31, 10:58 am, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>>> @comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Matt wrote
>>>>>>> innews:e5c6e48b-b2b6-4bb8-b0cd-519bf4
>>>>>> 0a4...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2:34 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>>>>> @comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "leg@sea" wrote
>>>>>>>>> innews:hcfe6s$aeg$1@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>>>>>>> Matt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 29, 8:29 pm, "leg@sea" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 28, 7:09 pm, "leg@sea" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Telles felches spaniels in the break room.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blah blah blah, Spammy is the 12 year old that rapes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> little boys. Point proven.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>>>>> How's life by the reservoir, shall we up the ante?
>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you mean you are going to reveal my (*gasp*) name and
>>>>>>>>>>> address, Spammy? Gee, anyone with a PHONE BOOK can do that.
>>>>>>>>>> I _sure hope_ none of those 'crazed' gun owners you're always
>>>>>>>>>> trying to disenfranchise finds there was over to Lakewood,
>>>>>>>>>> Colorado, Matty...
>>>>>>>>> They probably won't pay any attention to his address.....after
>>>>>>>>> all, the vast majority of them are adult enough to realize that
>>>>>>>>> differences of opinion exist....and always will.
>>>>>>>>>>> Done raping the 12 year old boys, Spammy?
>>>>>>>>>> Done trying to take away peoples' rights to own guns Matty?
>>>>>>>>> He hasn't tried to take mine away.....or yours if you have one.
>>>>>>>>> He simply has different ideas on gun control.
>>>>>>>> Eh, Spammy and I go way back to his Uncle Sam days on
>>>>>>>> co.general. Allegedly, he lives here. He doesn't like being
>>>>>>>> shown up.
>>>>>>>> As for gun control, I do have different ideas. I think that what
>>>>>>>> works in
>>>>>>>> one place won't work in another. In other words, I like the
>>>>>>>> concept of local control over matters. Does anyone truly
>>>>>>>> disagree?
>>>>>>> Yep. I believe in state control but not city by city. Why should
>>>>>>> someone doing something perfectly legal where he lives be thrown
>>>>>>> in jail while seeing his brother a few blocks over?
>>>>>> My easy answers to that would be the states of NY, CA and TX.
>>>>>> Consider:
>>>>>> Upstate NY is generally rural, very few very large cities,
>>>>>> considerable wild life,
>>>>>> no urban areas at all to speak of. Downstate, on the other hand, is
>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>> urban. Do you think the same rules would apply to both?
>>>>> NYC is made up of five buroughs. Do you believe the same rules shou
>>>> ld
>>>>> apply to all five? If they don't the dividing line is a street or
>>>>> neighborhood.
>>>> Dunno. In general, the 5 boroughs I would say yes. They are mostly the
>>>> same, with the possible exception of Staten Island. As to the dividing
>>>> line?
>>>> I haven't a clue, RD. I'm not that good.
>>> Then why are you pushing for something you haven't a clue about?
>> I'm not. I'm allowing individual cities to decide. Why do you think
>> they
>> shouldn't? Why even have cities if they can't have their own rules? Or
>> do
>> you think that only applies where guns are concerned. Numerous cities
>> in
>> my area do not allow non-four wheel drives during certain weather
>> conditions.
>> Florida has no such rules. Should we all bow to Florida's rules?
>
> We've tried it that way and we have the highest murder rate in the
> industrialized nations to show for it. It doesn't work.
No one got you yet, a fucking pity.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
