78abeb62   
   XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   Matt wrote:   
   > On Nov 2, 1:41 pm, "RD (The Sandman)"  @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >> Matt  wrote   
   >> innews:b6db7388-9219-4dd3-98a7-7f7f549bfc22@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> On Nov 1, 12:19 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>> Matt  wrote   
   >>>> innews:fa6cbdf8-5060-458c-91b4-c3fbb0   
   >>> e2e...@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >>>>> On Oct 31, 12:32 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>> Matt  wrote   
   >>>>>> innews:ff39ad91-8585-4434-a3ab-8d7cec   
   >>>>> a38...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>> On Oct 31, 10:58 am, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Matt  wrote   
   >>>>>>>> innews:e5c6e48b-b2b6-4bb8-b0cd-519bf4   
   >>>>>>> 0a4...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2:34 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>>>>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> "leg@sea"  wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>> innews:hcfe6s$aeg$1@news.eternal-september.org:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 29, 8:29 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 28, 7:09 pm, "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Telles felches spaniels in the break room.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blah blah blah, Spammy is the 12 year old that rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> little boys. Point proven.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> How's life by the reservoir, shall we up the ante?   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you mean you are going to reveal my (*gasp*) name   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and address, Spammy? Gee, anyone with a PHONE BOOK can do   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> that.   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I _sure hope_ none of those 'crazed' gun owners you're   
   >>>>>>>>>>> always trying to disenfranchise finds there was over to   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Lakewood, Colorado, Matty...   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>> They probably won't pay any attention to his   
   >>>>>>>>>> address.....after all, the vast majority of them are adult   
   >>>>>>>>>> enough to realize that differences of opinion exist....and   
   >>>>>>>>>> always will.   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Done raping the 12 year old boys, Spammy?   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Done trying to take away peoples' rights to own guns   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Matty?   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>>> He hasn't tried to take mine away.....or yours if you have   
   >>>>>>>>>> one. He simply has different ideas on gun control.   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>> Eh, Spammy and I go way back to his Uncle Sam days on   
   >>>>>>>>> co.general. Allegedly, he lives here. He doesn't like being   
   >>>>>>>>> shown up.   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>>> As for gun control, I do have different ideas. I think that   
   >>>>>>>>> what works in   
   >>>>>>>>> one place won't work in another. In other words, I like the   
   >>>>>>>>> concept of local control over matters. Does anyone truly   
   >>>>>>>>> disagree?   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>> Yep. I believe in state control but not city by city. Why sho   
   >>> uld   
   >>>>>>>> someone doing something perfectly legal where he lives be   
   >>>>>>>> thrown in jail while seeing his brother a few blocks over?   
   >>   
   >>>>>>> My easy answers to that would be the states of NY, CA and TX.   
   >>   
   >>>>>>> Consider:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>> Upstate NY is generally rural, very few very large cities,   
   >>>>>>> considerable wild life,   
   >>>>>>> no urban areas at all to speak of. Downstate, on the other hand,   
   >>>>>>> is mostly   
   >>>>>>> urban. Do you think the same rules would apply to both?   
   >>   
   >>>>>> NYC is made up of five buroughs. Do you believe the same rules s   
   >>>>>> hou ld apply to all five? If they don't the dividing line is a   
   >>>>>> street or neighborhood.   
   >>   
   >>>>> Dunno. In general, the 5 boroughs I would say yes. They are mostly   
   >>>>> the same, with the possible exception of Staten Island. As to the   
   >>>>> dividing line?   
   >>>>> I haven't a clue, RD. I'm not that good.   
   >>   
   >>>> Then why are you pushing for something you haven't a clue about?   
   >>   
   >>> I'm not. I'm allowing individual cities to decide. Why do you think   
   >>> they   
   >>> shouldn't? Why even have cities if they can't have their own rules?   
   >>   
   >> Damn, why have neighborhoods if they can't have their own rules? Why   
   >> have suburbs if they can't have their own rules? Whaaaaaahhhhh, why   
   >> can't I have my own rules on my own block? You don't think that   
   >> there is   
   >> enough government interference in our lives as it is?   
   >   
   > And what is it you are complaining about? Oh, right, government   
   > interference.   
      
   Except there is a difference between government interference that prevents   
   the exercise of ones rights, and interference that protects the exercise of   
   one's rights. If you can't see the difference, then clearly you will never   
   be able to understand the points he is making.   
      
      
      
   > You don't see the problem, and you expect people to take you   
   > seriously.   
      
   Good point, so why do you expect people to take you seriously when you can't   
   see that infringing people's rights is a problem, and protecting people's   
   rights is the solution.   
      
   Do you think people should have different rights because of which side of   
   the street they live on?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)