6b930961
XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell
From: leg@sea
Matt wrote:
> On Nov 5, 5:19 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" @comcast.net> wrote:
>> Matt wrote in news:c7f26fc7-8253-4119-ab1f-
>> a4c6c8c0b...@g10g2000pri.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >> @comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> Matt wrote in news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-
>>>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:
>>>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude > @yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt wrote:
>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude > @yahoo.co
>>> m>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at it
>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> one viewpoint.
>>>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine start.
>>>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.
>>>>>>> I agree.
>>>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.
>>>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.
>>>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".
>>>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's fine.
>>>>> But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and more
>>>>> hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.
>>>> Or you. Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects
>> your
>>>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness". None of those are
>> affect
>>> ed
>>>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.
>>> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as
>>> opposed to
>>> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk.
>> Two questions:
>>
>> 1. The only place I can think of where you *MUST* frequent would be a
>> government office. Guns are usually banned in there. Do you have some
>> other place in mind?
>>
>> 2. Just how would my having a gun put your life at risk? Are you
>> planning to attack me or threaten my life?
>>
>>> Are you seriously going to
>>> tell me that no gun owner or carrier has ever killed anyone that
>>> wasn't threatening them?
>> Nope, because it has happened. Of course your odds of being killed in a
>> Tornado or be struck by lightning are higher that that occurrence. If
>> you have proof of the contrary, then feel free to post it.
>
> FORT HOOD, Texas – A military mental health doctor facing deployment
> overseas opened fire at the Fort Hood Army base on Thursday, setting
> off on a rampage that
So you want ALL your fellow soldiers disarmed?!?!
How about on the battlefield?
I love watching you flail Matty, you cunt.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
