XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: leg@sea   
      
   RD (The Sandman) wrote:   
   > Matt  wrote in   
   > news:ba41102d-1bd1-43f0-8b3d-6f8fdb5f2e61@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com:   
   >   
   >> On Nov 5, 5:16 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude    
   >> wrote:   
   >>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>> Matt  wrote in   
   >>>>> news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-   
   >>>>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>> > om>   
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>> > .com>   
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at   
   >>>>>>>>>> it   
   >>>>> from   
   >>>>>>>>>> one viewpoint.   
   >>>>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine   
   >>>>>>>>>> start.   
   >>>>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>>> I agree.   
   >>>>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.   
   >>>>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".   
   >>>>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's   
   >>>>>> fine. But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and   
   >>>>>> more hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.   
   >>>>> Or you.  Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects   
   >>>>> y   
   >> our   
   >>>>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness".  None of those are   
   >>>>> aff   
   >> ected   
   >>>>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.   
   >>>> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as   
   >>>> opposed to   
   >>>> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk.   
   >>> You have no right to be free from fear. None at all. Just like you   
   >>> have no right to free medical attention, free food, or free cars.   
   >> Says the man so scared that he can't defend himself that he needs a   
   >> gun. End of discussion, child. Face me hand to hand.   
   >   
   > Would you also threaten someone half your size in a wheelchair?  That's   
   > not me, but it seems to be type of person you feel comfortable facing. I   
   > carry a gun because I am 70 years old and I can't take people apart like   
   > I used to be able to.  That means that if you approach me hand to hand   
   > with serious intent to attack me, consider you may make your fears come   
   > true and find out exactly why I carry.  End of discussion, child.   
   >   
   >   
      
   Sensibly ended.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)