XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: leg@sea   
      
   Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   > In talk.politics.guns "RD (The Sandman)"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Matt  wrote in   
   >> news:ba41102d-1bd1-43f0-8b3d-6f8fdb5f2e61@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Nov 5, 5:16 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>> Matt  wrote in   
   >>>>>> news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-   
   >>>>>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>>>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>> >> om>   
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>>> >> .com>   
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at   
   >>>>>>>>>>> it   
   >>>>>> from   
   >>>>>>>>>>> one viewpoint.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine   
   >>>>>>>>>>> start.   
   >>>>>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>>>> I agree.   
   >>>>>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.   
   >>>>>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".   
   >>>>>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's   
   >>>>>>> fine. But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and   
   >>>>>>> more hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.   
   >>>>>> Or you.  Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects   
   >>>>>> y   
   >>> our   
   >>>>>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness".  None of those are   
   >>>>>> aff   
   >>> ected   
   >>>>>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.   
   >>>>> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as   
   >>>>> opposed to   
   >>>>> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk.   
   >>>> You have no right to be free from fear. None at all. Just like you   
   >>>> have no right to free medical attention, free food, or free cars.   
   >>> Says the man so scared that he can't defend himself that he needs a   
   >>> gun. End of discussion, child. Face me hand to hand.   
   >> Would you also threaten someone half your size in a wheelchair?  That's   
   >> not me, but it seems to be type of person you feel comfortable facing. I   
   >> carry a gun because I am 70 years old and I can't take people apart like   
   >> I used to be able to.  That means that if you approach me hand to hand   
   >> with serious intent to attack me, consider you may make your fears come   
   >> true and find out exactly why I carry.  End of discussion, child.   
   >   
   > Can you tell me where we went from waiting for Matt trying to describe   
   > how my carrying a gun violates his rights to puffing out his chest and   
   > issuing the man to man challenge?   
   >   
   > Did my news reader drop some posts?  ;>   
      
   ROTFLMFAO!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)