XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: leg@sea   
      
   Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   > In talk.politics.guns "leg@sea"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Matt wrote:   
   >>> On Nov 5, 5:19 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>> Matt  wrote in news:c7f26fc7-8253-4119-ab1f-   
   >>>> a4c6c8c0b...@g10g2000pri.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>> Matt  wrote in news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-   
   >>>>>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>>>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude >>> @yahoo.com>   
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude >>> @yahoo.co   
   >>>>> m>   
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at it   
   >>>>>> from   
   >>>>>>>>>>> one viewpoint.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine start.   
   >>>>>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>>>> I agree.   
   >>>>>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.   
   >>>>>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".   
   >>>>>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's fine.   
   >>>>>>> But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and more   
   >>>>>>> hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.   
   >>>>>> Or you.  Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects   
   >>>> your   
   >>>>>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness".  None of those are   
   >>>> affect   
   >>>>> ed   
   >>>>>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.   
   >>>>> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as   
   >>>>> opposed to   
   >>>>> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk.   
   >>>> Two questions:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> 1.  The only place I can think of where you *MUST* frequent would be a   
   >>>> government office.  Guns are usually banned in there.  Do you have some   
   >>>> other place in mind?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> 2.  Just how would my having a gun put your life at risk?  Are you   
   >>>> planning to attack me or threaten my life?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Are you seriously going to   
   >>>>> tell me that no gun owner or carrier has ever killed anyone that   
   >>>>> wasn't threatening them?   
   >>>> Nope, because it has happened.  Of course your odds of being killed in a   
   >>>> Tornado or be struck by lightning are higher that that occurrence.  If   
   >>>> you have proof of the contrary, then feel free to post it.   
   >>> FORT HOOD, Texas – A military mental health doctor facing deployment   
   >>> overseas opened fire at the Fort Hood Army base on Thursday, setting   
   >>> off on a rampage that   
   >> So you want ALL your fellow soldiers disarmed?!?!   
   >   
   > What do you mean 'fellow soldiers?"   
   >   
   > Are you insinuating that Matt is one of America's Fighting Men?   
      
   Lol, not for a minute.   
      
   But his gripe was other people having firearms in places he *MUST* frequent.   
      
   So ergo if he were in the military, HE would have BIG TIME problem with   
   his fellow soldiers, yes?   
      
   >> How about on the battlefield?   
   >>   
   >> I love watching you flail Matty, you cunt.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)