6d5a8643   
   XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: leg@sea   
      
   Matt wrote:   
   > On Nov 5, 6:09 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude    
   > wrote:   
   >> In talk.politics.guns "RD (The Sandman)"   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>> Matt  wrote in   
   >>> news:ba41102d-1bd1-43f0-8b3d-6f8fdb5f2e61@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>> On Nov 5, 5:16 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>>> Matt  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-   
   >>>>>>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>> >>> om>   
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>>>> >>> .com>   
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> it   
   >>>>>>> from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> one viewpoint.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> start.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>>>>> I agree.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.   
   >>>>>>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".   
   >>>>>>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's   
   >>>>>>>> fine. But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and   
   >>>>>>>> more hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.   
   >>>>>>> Or you.  Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects   
   >>>>>>> y   
   >>>> our   
   >>>>>>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness".  None of those are   
   >>>>>>> aff   
   >>>> ected   
   >>>>>>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.   
   >>>>>> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as   
   >>>>>> opposed to   
   >>>>>> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk.   
   >>>>> You have no right to be free from fear. None at all. Just like you   
   >>>>> have no right to free medical attention, free food, or free cars.   
   >>>> Says the man so scared that he can't defend himself that he needs a   
   >>>> gun. End of discussion, child. Face me hand to hand.   
   >>> Would you also threaten someone half your size in a wheelchair?  That's   
   >>> not me, but it seems to be type of person you feel comfortable facing. I   
   >>> carry a gun because I am 70 years old and I can't take people apart like   
   >>> I used to be able to.  That means that if you approach me hand to hand   
   >>> with serious intent to attack me, consider you may make your fears come   
   >>> true and find out exactly why I carry.  End of discussion, child.   
   >> Can you tell me where we went from waiting for Matt trying to describe   
   >> how my carrying a gun violates his rights to puffing out his chest and   
   >> issuing the man to man challenge?   
   >>   
   >> Did my news reader drop some posts?  ;>- Hide quoted text -   
   >>   
   >> - Show quoted text -   
   >   
   > Translation: Klaus, like baby Spammy, is too scared.   
      
   Uh..I made YOU the invite first Matty, numerous times.   
      
   Each time you have chickened out, you yellow fascist bastard.   
      
   > Not a surprise.  Buh-bye babies. Let me know when you are willing to   
   > show up with real name and address.   
   >   
   > Matt   
      
   That's always Matty's chicken-out demand.   
      
   He's to fucking cowardly to just show up at a Denver area gym and trade   
   some blows.   
      
   He's a cunt.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)