b43ee24d   
   XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: leg@sea   
      
   Matt wrote:   
   > On Nov 5, 7:08 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude    
   > wrote:   
   >> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> On Nov 5, 6:09 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>> In talk.politics.guns "RD (The Sandman)"   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>> Matt  wrote in   
   >>>>> news:ba41102d-1bd1-43f0-8b3d-6f8fdb5f2e61@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>>>> On Nov 5, 5:16 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>>>>> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Matt  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>> news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-   
   >>>>>>>>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> om>   
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> .com>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it   
   >>>>>>>>> from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one viewpoint.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> start.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".   
   >>>>>>>>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's   
   >>>>>>>>>> fine. But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and   
   >>>>>>>>>> more hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.   
   >>>>>>>>> Or you.  Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects   
   >>>>>>>>> y   
   >>>>>> our   
   >>>>>>>>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness".  None of those are   
   >>>>>>>>> aff   
   >>>>>> ected   
   >>>>>>>>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.   
   >>>>>>>> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as   
   >>>>>>>> opposed to   
   >>>>>>>> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk.   
   >>>>>>> You have no right to be free from fear. None at all. Just like you   
   >>>>>>> have no right to free medical attention, free food, or free cars.   
   >>>>>> Says the man so scared that he can't defend himself that he needs a   
   >>>>>> gun. End of discussion, child. Face me hand to hand.   
   >>>>> Would you also threaten someone half your size in a wheelchair?  That's   
   >>>>> not me, but it seems to be type of person you feel comfortable facing. I   
   >>>>> carry a gun because I am 70 years old and I can't take people apart like   
   >>>>> I used to be able to.  That means that if you approach me hand to hand   
   >>>>> with serious intent to attack me, consider you may make your fears come   
   >>>>> true and find out exactly why I carry.  End of discussion, child.   
   >>>> Can you tell me where we went from waiting for Matt trying to describe   
   >>>> how my carrying a gun violates his rights to puffing out his chest and   
   >>>> issuing the man to man challenge?   
   >>>> Did my news reader drop some posts?  ;>- Hide quoted text -   
   >>>> - Show quoted text -   
   >>> Translation: Klaus, like baby Spammy, is too scared.   
   >>> Not a surprise.  Buh-bye babies. Let me know when you are willing to   
   >>> show up with real name and address.   
   >> ROFLMAO   
   >   
   > WAHHH WAHHH, cries the Klaus.   
   >   
   > Come back when you grow a spine, Klaus.   
   >   
   > Matt   
      
   Shaddup cunt, you're yellow to the core.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)