6f3606f3
XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell
From: leg@sea
Matt wrote:
> On Nov 5, 5:58 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" @comcast.net> wrote:
>> Matt wrote innews:2a516e09-93ad-4cbe
93f1-a143ae3bb5b1@r24g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 5, 5:19 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >> @comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> Matt wrote in news:c7f26fc7-8253-4119-ab1f-
>>>> a4c6c8c0b...@g10g2000pri.googlegroups.com:
>>>>> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>> @comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Matt wrote in
>>>>>> news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-
>>>>>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude >>> @yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude >>> @yahoo.co
>>>>> m>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> one viewpoint.
>>>>>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine
>>>>>>>>>>> start.
>>>>>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.
>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>>>>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.
>>>>>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.
>>>>>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".
>>>>>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's
>>>>>>> fine. But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and
>>>>>>> more hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.
>>>>>> Or you. Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects
>>>> your
>>>>>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness". None of those are
>>>> affect
>>>>> ed
>>>>>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.
>>>>> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as
>>>>> opposed to
>>>>> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk.
>>>> Two questions:
>>>> 1. The only place I can think of where you *MUST* frequent would be
>>>> a government office. Guns are usually banned in there. Do you have
>>>> so
>>> me
>>>> other place in mind?
>>>> 2. Just how would my having a gun put your life at risk? Are you
>>>> planning to attack me or threaten my life?
>>>>> Are you seriously going to
>>>>> tell me that no gun owner or carrier has ever killed anyone that
>>>>> wasn't threatening them?
>>>> Nope, because it has happened. Of course your odds of being killed
>>>> in
>>> a
>>>> Tornado or be struck by lightning are higher that that occurrence.
>>>> If you have proof of the contrary, then feel free to post it.
>>> FORT HOOD, Texas – A military mental health doctor facing deployment
>>> overseas opened fire at the Fort Hood Army base on Thursday, setting
>>> off on a rampage that killed 11 other people and left 31 wounded.
>>> Authorities killed the gunman, and the violence was believed to be the
>>> worst mass shooting in history at a U.S. military base.
>>> The shooting began around 1:30 p.m., when shots were fired at the
>>> base's Soldier Readiness Center, where soldiers who are about to be
>>> deployed or who are returning undergo medical screening, said Lt. Gen.
>>> Bob Cone at Fort Hood.
>> Yep, aware of it. You do realize that most Democrats and antigunners
>> feel that guns should be restricted to just law enforcement or the
>> military. How did that work for you at Ft Hood?
>
> How did it work for YOU? Could you stand up to an armed soldier?
So all soldiers should be unarmed?!?!?
> I'm tired of you people trying to have it both ways.
That's your picket fence to lie on, hypocrite.
> Guns are defensive,
> except, of course when they aren't.
Why yes and cars are transportation, when they're not weapons, so?
> But then, it is because they are
> all gang-bangers (lots of THEM in the army) or nutcases.
Who is this "they" you speak of?
Truck drivers kill too you know.
> I think we've defined the pro-gun group, haven't we?
>
> Matt
You and which insolent mouse?
You yellow cunt.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
