2a42e7c0
XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell
From: claypoolbrian@gmail.com
Matt wrote:
> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" @comcast.net> wrote:
>> Matt wrote in news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-
>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>> wrote:
>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt wrote:
>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at it
>> from
>>>>>>> one viewpoint.
>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine start.
>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.
>>>>> I agree.
>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.
>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.
>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".
>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's fine.
>>> But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and more
>>> hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.
>> Or you. Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects your
>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness". None of those are affected
>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.
>
> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as
> opposed to
> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk. Are you seriously
> going to
> tell me that no gun owner or carrier has ever killed anyone that
> wasn't threatening
> them? Please do, I shall happily post 10 examples to the contrary.
>
> Now, clarify.
Your bluff is called. Do so.
--
Cheers,
Bama Brian
Libertarian
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
