6b930961   
   XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell   
   From: claypoolbrian@gmail.com   
      
   Matt wrote:   
   > On Nov 5, 5:19 pm, "RD (The Sandman)"  @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >> Matt  wrote in news:c7f26fc7-8253-4119-ab1f-   
   >> a4c6c8c0b...@g10g2000pri.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >> @comcast.net> wrote:   
   >>>> Matt  wrote in news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-   
   >>>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:   
   >>>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude > @yahoo.com>   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude > @yahoo.co   
   >>> m>   
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at it   
   >>>> from   
   >>>>>>>>> one viewpoint.   
   >>>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine start.   
   >>>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.   
   >>>>>>> I agree.   
   >>>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.   
   >>>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.   
   >>>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".   
   >>>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's fine.   
   >>>>> But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and more   
   >>>>> hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.   
   >>>> Or you.  Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects   
   >> your   
   >>>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness".  None of those are   
   >> affect   
   >>> ed   
   >>>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.   
   >>> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as   
   >>> opposed to   
   >>> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk.   
   >> Two questions:   
   >>   
   >> 1.  The only place I can think of where you *MUST* frequent would be a   
   >> government office.  Guns are usually banned in there.  Do you have some   
   >> other place in mind?   
   >>   
   >> 2.  Just how would my having a gun put your life at risk?  Are you   
   >> planning to attack me or threaten my life?   
   >>   
   >>> Are you seriously going to   
   >>> tell me that no gun owner or carrier has ever killed anyone that   
   >>> wasn't threatening them?   
   >> Nope, because it has happened.  Of course your odds of being killed in a   
   >> Tornado or be struck by lightning are higher that that occurrence.  If   
   >> you have proof of the contrary, then feel free to post it.   
   >   
   > FORT HOOD, Texas – A military mental health doctor facing deployment   
   > overseas opened fire at the Fort Hood Army base on Thursday, setting   
   > off on a rampage that killed 11 other people and left 31 wounded.   
   > Authorities killed the gunman, and the violence was believed to be the   
   > worst mass shooting in history at a U.S. military base.   
   >   
   > The shooting began around 1:30 p.m., when shots were fired at the   
   > base's Soldier Readiness Center, where soldiers who are about to be   
   > deployed or who are returning undergo medical screening, said Lt. Gen.   
   > Bob Cone at Fort Hood.   
      
   Said doctor was a Muslim born and true, despite being born and raised in   
   the US.  The US Army will seriously rethink its enlistment policies   
   after this.   
      
   Now try listing something that wasn't done by a psychotic or religious   
   extremist.  IMNSHO everyone who selects psychiatry as a profession does   
   so because they are already unbalanced.   
      
   --   
   Cheers,   
   Bama Brian   
   Libertarian   
   "Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."   
   George Santayana   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)