XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.art-bell
From: leg@sea
Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> In talk.politics.guns "leg@sea" wrote:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> In talk.politics.guns "leg@sea" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Matt wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 5, 5:19 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>> @comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Matt wrote in news:c7f26fc7-8253-4119-ab1f-
>>>>>> a4c6c8c0b...@g10g2000pri.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 5, 4:12 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" >>>>>> @comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Matt wrote in news:c625d3fb-f8ab-4ef8-a74b-
>>>>>>>> 8ae131e3d...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 5:14 pm, Klaus Schadenfreude >>>>> @yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 3, 7:26 am, Klaus Schadenfreude >>>>> @yahoo.co
>>>>>>> m>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In talk.politics.guns Matt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do see his point. The problem is, you are only looking at it
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one viewpoint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have rights as well, and your rights stop where mine start.
>>>>>>>>>>>> My gun ownership has zero effect on your rights.
>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>>>>>>>>>> Your gun CARRYING does have an effect on my rights.
>>>>>>>>>> My carrying a gun has absolutely ZERO effect on your rights.
>>>>>>>>> Really. "Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness".
>>>>>>>>> Try again. Better yet, don't. You disagree with me, and that's fine.
>>>>>>>>> But simply repeating the same old rhetoric with more and more
>>>>>>>>> hyperbole isn't getting anyone anywhere.
>>>>>>>> Or you. Please be specific about how my carrying of a gun affects
>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> "life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness". None of those are
>>>>>> affect
>>>>>>> ed
>>>>>>>> unless your pursuit of happiness includes disarming me.
>>>>>>> If you are carrying a gun in a place that I *Must* frequent (as
>>>>>>> opposed to
>>>>>>> may, or could) then I consider my life at risk.
>>>>>> Two questions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. The only place I can think of where you *MUST* frequent would be a
>>>>>> government office. Guns are usually banned in there. Do you have some
>>>>>> other place in mind?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Just how would my having a gun put your life at risk? Are you
>>>>>> planning to attack me or threaten my life?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you seriously going to
>>>>>>> tell me that no gun owner or carrier has ever killed anyone that
>>>>>>> wasn't threatening them?
>>>>>> Nope, because it has happened. Of course your odds of being killed in a
>>>>>> Tornado or be struck by lightning are higher that that occurrence. If
>>>>>> you have proof of the contrary, then feel free to post it.
>>>>> FORT HOOD, Texas – A military mental health doctor facing deployment
>>>>> overseas opened fire at the Fort Hood Army base on Thursday, setting
>>>>> off on a rampage that
>>>> So you want ALL your fellow soldiers disarmed?!?!
>>> What do you mean 'fellow soldiers?"
>>>
>>> Are you insinuating that Matt is one of America's Fighting Men?
>> Lol, not for a minute.
>>
>> But his gripe was other people having firearms in places he *MUST* frequent.
>>
>> So ergo if he were in the military, HE would have BIG TIME problem with
>> his fellow soldiers, yes?
>
> Gotcha. If he could only, somehow, muster the courage and tell me how
> my carrying a gun infringes on his rights, well, we might get
> somewhere. But obviously his inability to describe this scenario has
> caused him great mental conflict.
Oodles, so he dissembles and decouples.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
