XPost: alt.politics.conservative, alt.politics.republicans, alt.   
   olitics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.republican, alt.politics.usa.misc, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, can.talk.guns   
   From: 10x@teluös.net   
      
   On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:47:21 -0600, "Devil's Advocate"   
    wrote:   
      
   >10x <10x@telious.net>  wrote :   
   >   
   >> Small correction.   
   >> Licensed gun owners let their firearms license lapse.  They are   
   >> currently currently covered by an amnesty allowning them to renew   
   >> their firearms license without facing criminal charges.  That amnesty   
   >> expires May 16, 2010.   
   >> Some of these folks had registration ceritifcates for guns  attached   
   >> to the expired license that were revoked.  Some have not had their   
   >> registrations revoked.   
   >> Toronto police were seizing firearms from gun owners who's firearms   
   >> license had expired.   
   >> The police had every right to seize these guns and if there were no   
   >> amnesty in place the police had every right to charge these ex legal   
   >> gun owners under section 91 and 92 of the Criminal code of Canada.   
   >> Any individiual who knowling lets their firearms license expire and is   
   >> in possession of firearms is liable to a five year prision sentence.   
   >   
   >Why should anyone have to get a license ( government permission ) to   
   >exercise a HUMAN RIGHT?!   
      
      
   Because the government thinks it has the power to do so....   
      
   >http://www.a-human-right.com/introduction.html   
   >   
   >Any government that requires a license to exercise a HUMAN RIGHT is a   
   >tyranny to that extent!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)