XPost: usa, us.politics, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   Sanders Kaufman wrote:   
   > "Bill Smith"  wrote in message   
   > news:51kgo59ap01l0ekgh9sg8slvoprdduhlnf@4ax.com...   
   >> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:07:17 -0600, "Sanders Kaufman"   
   >   
   >>>> You're right, it would be much more accurate to call them potential   
   >>>> victims.   
   >>>   
   >>> I suppose, since you approach the situation from a position of   
   >>> cowardice, that would certainly be your perspective.   
   >>>   
   >> What makes you say that?   
   >   
   > A keen sense of spatial relationship.   
   > For example - if a bullet enters from the north and exits through the   
   > south, one does not need to actually be in the shooter's place to   
   > know that he is north of the target.   
   > So, too, does it stand to reason that when some anonymous gun-nut on   
   > the web says that everyone as a potential victim, he is approaching   
   > the situation from a position of cowardice.   
      
   Please indicate how stating the possible is a matter or position of   
   cowardice.   
      
      
      
      
   >   
   > Now, my question for you is  - what would make you think he's   
   > anything OTHER than a coward?   
      
   Your strawman, you feed him.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)