XPost: usa, us.politics, talk.politics.guns   
   From: bucky@kaufman.net   
      
   "Scout"  wrote in message   
   news:WXYhn.13589$ND2.1032@newsfe05.iad...   
   > Sanders Kaufman wrote:   
      
   >> So, too, does it stand to reason that when some anonymous gun-nut on   
   >> the web says that everyone as a potential victim, he is approaching   
   >> the situation from a position of cowardice.   
   >   
   > Please indicate how stating the possible is a matter or position of   
   > cowardice.   
      
   There are many, many possibilities.   
   But the only one you see is the possibility of being a victim.   
      
   I realize that, among gun nuts, there's nothing unusual about that.   
   But to folks who are not afraid of every little thing, that's just plain   
   cowardice.   
      
   It's like when you were shrieking that Obama was going to send the Men in   
   Black to seize everybody's guns.   
   It didn't happen - but echoes of that campaign still ring throughout the   
   gun-nut community.   
   Are they afraid because it's possible?  No - and it's not.   
      
   They're just afraid because cowardice is core to the nature of the character   
   of gun-rights advocates.   
   Without their fear, they'd be nothing.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)