Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.general    |    More than just amusing South Park antics    |    76,942 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 75,893 of 76,942    |
|    Whistleblower to All    |
|    9-11: INSIDE JOB PROOF! (1/4)    |
|    13 Sep 10 14:04:11    |
      XPost: az.general, ca.general, dc.general       XPost: fl.general       From: Justice@USA.con              NINE-ELEVEN - NEVER AGAIN!              To understand the point I wish to make, let's assume that an obviously alien       creature was walking peacefully down the street, and observe peoples'       reactions to it.              Some would simply not see it! Their brains would reject as IMPOSSIBLE what       their eyes tell them, and block out their awareness of the unearthly       creature.              Some might stare, perhaps be shocked or frightened, but then go on,       rationalizing that they only saw someone in costume, or that they had       indulged too heavily at last night's party and were seeing things. They       would tell no one what they saw for fear of being called crazy. They would       even, in defense of their own rationalization, label other people that       reported such a sighting crazy. This is the psychological phenomenon of       DENIAL.              Perhaps in fear for their own sanity, deniers condemn as crazy others that       claim aliens or whatever to be real. Such assertions are frightening because       they violate their sense of reality - "only KOOKS believe in aliens!" Thus       people tend to reject as unreal what is not comfortable for them to accept,       and likewise embrace beliefs that do not hold up to scientific scrutiny but       do provide them comfort. You don't believe what you DON'T WANT to believe;       denial thus serves to protect the mind from what would be mentally traumatic       if accepted.              Some things are simply too horrific, too abominably appalling, too greatly       in violation of what we WANT to think or believe, to accept as actual       reality - even when they ARE real! "Look; the Emperor wears no clothes,"       said the child too naïve to know that such facts are not to be spoken of,       nor even acknowledged to oneself.              PSYOPS - definition paraphrased from Wikipedia: Psychological Operations.       Techniques used to influence a target audience's value systems, beliefs,       emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. PSYOPS are used to induce       confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the       originator's objectives, and are sometimes combined with black operations or       false flag tactics. The phrase is commonly used by governments who wish to       avoid the terms propaganda and brainwashing in reference to their own work       because those terms have negative connotations. The use of such euphemisms       for what is in effect mind control is itself an example of psychological       operations, i.e. using psychological techniques to persuade a large number       of people to support something they wouldn't normally support or to       unquestioningly accept lies.              Obviously, to permit or commit an atrocity on the scale of the 9/11 attacks,       and/or to exploit the horror, shock, and fear thus created to influence       public opinion and actions, is clearly a PSYOP. The exploitation of the       psychological phenomenon of DENIAL is also clearly a PSYOP. Who would want       to believe that traitors in our own government would permit, or even       perpetrate, such an atrocity on their own people? How much easier it would       be to accept the existence of aliens - or fanatical Jihadists!              "But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy       and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a       democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist       dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the       bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they       are being attacked and then denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism       and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." -       Hermann Goering at the Nuremberg Trials.              Now that we understand what PSYOPS are, and the psychological phenomenon of       DENIAL, we are in a better position to rationally investigate the true       nature and possible sources of the 9/11 attacks.              The UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE of an INSIDE JOB:              BLOWN TO BITS:              The sudden, complete, straight down at near free fall speed collapse of       steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes, is the       SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy. The building's minor fires and debris       damage could not account for this collapse, which had all the earmarks of       controlled demolition by explosives. Videos clearly show this. Such       demolitions take many days or weeks to set up - not the few hours between       the attacks and the collapse. The explosives therefore had to be put in       place BEFOREHAND. This lends credibility to the use of previously placed       explosives to bring down the towers as well, which like the badly damaged       and fire-gutted Deutchbank building would probably have remained standing.              Propaganda shills, disinformationists, and those in psychological denial       still insist the collapse of WTC 7 could not be what it obviously was, and       they employ often ludicrous rationalizations and fabrications, elaborate       lies, and infantile ad-hominem attacks to defend their indefensible       position. The REAL terrorists are desperate to cover up their mass-murderous       crime of the century - the permitting if not perpetration of, and subsequent       political and economic exploitation of the fully preventable 9/11 disaster.       Could Bin Laden have somehow totally incapacitated NORAD - the world's most       sophisticated aerospace defense system - on that horrible morning? I don't       think so!              There is evidence of an INSIDE JOB even more clear and indisputable than the       explosive demolition collapse of building 7 and the standing down of NORAD.       Many very small HUMAN BODY FRAGMENTS have been found on the roofs of nearby       buildings. These were too far away to be from jumpers from the towers. If       the towers simply collapsed from damage and fire alone, what blew these       bodies to smithereens and sent the fragments flying for considerable       distances? The plane impacts did not have the explosive brisance (shattering       force) necessary to do this - only HIGH EXPLOSIVES can blow bodies to tiny       bits and throw them such distances.              So - who can credibly account for these body fragments, other than their       being the result of high explosives being detonated in the towers?              The following article proves, using the inviolate laws of physics, the       falsity of the government's propaganda explanation for the building       collapses:              SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE - GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE       EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK              On September 11, 2001, the world watched in horror as the World TradeCenter       (WTC) Twin Towers collapsed, killing thousands of innocent people. Videos of       the collapses were replayed ad nauseam on TV for days. About 5 hours after              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca