Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.general    |    More than just amusing South Park antics    |    76,942 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 76,055 of 76,942    |
|    Sylvia to All    |
|    control ?    |
|    30 Jun 12 11:09:53    |
      95e50abc       From: sv@gmail.com              Hello,              you should look at this piece of information        For the last few years, a       small group of farmers and landowners scattered across this rural Wyoming       basin have complained that their water wells have been contaminated with       chemicals from a controversial drilling technique known as hydraulic       fracturing, or fracking.        A draft report by the Environmental Protection       Agency, issued in December, appeared to confirm their concerns, linking       chemicals in local groundwater to gas drilling.        “These are people that had       good water,” said John Fenton, a barrel-chested farmer and chairman of the       Pavillion Area Concerned Citizens group. “And it changed when there was this       rush to come in here and develop the area when they didn’t understand the       geology.”        Renny MacKay, a spokesman for Mr. Mead, said the governor was       committed to figuring out a long-term fix for about 20 homes whose water was       found to contain contaminants while the source of the pollution is studied.               A draft report by the Environmental Protection Agency, issued in December,       appeared to confirm their concerns, linking chemicals in local groundwater to        gas drilling.        For the last few years, a small group of farmers and       landowners scattered across this rural Wyoming basin have complained that       their water wells have been contaminated with chemicals from a controversial       drilling technique known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.        In the       meantime, the state has offered to provide cisterns for local residents,       using $750,000 allocated by the Wyoming Legislature this year. Under the       plan, people here would still have to pay a fee to have their water hauled       from the nearby community of Pavillion, at a cost that could run more than       $150 per month.        “Until there is a peer-reviewed study and a good scientific        basis that indicates that the issues related to water are related to our       operations, that is not something we are ready to address,” said Doug Hock,       an Encana spokesman.              However, This article is uncomplete:        Mr. Hock said it should have come as no       surprise that the E.P.A.’s two monitoring wells showed high levels of methane        and benzene because they were drilled deep into a natural gas field.        But       here on the front lines of the battle over fracking, which has become an       increasingly popular technique to extract previously unobtainable reserves of        oil and gas, no conclusion is yet definitive.        “I’d like to have the       industry held accountable for once,” said Jeff Locker, a hay and barley       farmer who said that his well water had gone bad around the mid-’90s and that        the contaminants had contributed to his wife’s neuropathy. “We’ve got       scientific proof. And they’re still turning their back on us. They expect us       to pay between $100 and $200 for something we didn’t cause. It gets under my       skin.”        Renny MacKay, a spokesman for Mr. Mead, said the governor was       committed to figuring out a long-term fix for about 20 homes whose water was       found to contain contaminants while the source of the pollution is studied.               “Until there is a peer-reviewed study and a good scientific basis that       indicates that the issues related to water are related to our operations,       that is not something we are ready to address,” said Doug Hock, an Encana       spokesman.        “Until there is a peer-reviewed study and a good scientific       basis that indicates that the issues related to water are related to our       operations, that is not something we are ready to address,” said Doug Hock,       an Encana spokesman.        After an outcry from Wyoming’s governor, Matt Mead,       and the energy industry that the federal report was premature and       inconclusive, more testing was conducted by the United States Geological       Survey and is being processed. The E.P.A. is also in the midst of collecting       additional water samples for study.        “I’d like to have the industry held       accountable for once,” said Jeff Locker, a hay and barley farmer who said       that his well water had gone bad around the mid-’90s and that the       contaminants had contributed to his wife’s neuropathy. “We’ve got scientific       proof. And they’re still turning their back on us. They expect us to pay       between $100 and $200 for something we didn’t cause. It gets under my skin.”               A draft report by the Environmental Protection Agency, issued in December,       appeared to confirm their concerns, linking chemicals in local groundwater to        gas drilling.        But here on the front lines of the battle over fracking,       which has become an increasingly popular technique to extract previously       unobtainable reserves of oil and gas, no conclusion is yet definitive.        In       the meantime, the state has offered to provide cisterns for local residents,       using $750,000 allocated by the Wyoming Legislature this year. Under the       plan, people here would still have to pay a fee to have their water hauled       from the nearby community of Pavillion, at a cost that could run more than       $150 per month.        But some locals say the draft report’s analysis of water       samples, which identified synthetic chemicals consistent with natural gas       drilling and hydraulic fracturing fluids, is proof of what they suspected for        years.        Encana has maintained that water in the area is naturally poor and       that its operations did not cause the problems — fracking had also occurred       before the company purchased the gas field. Moreover, the energy industry has        steadfastly pointed out that there has never been any conclusive link       between fracking and water contamination.        But here on the front lines of       the battle over fracking, which has become an increasingly popular technique       to extract previously unobtainable reserves of oil and gas, no conclusion is       yet definitive.              Before thinking about the water , you should look at this link h       tp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_quality       tchao              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca