Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.general    |    More than just amusing South Park antics    |    76,942 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 76,198 of 76,942    |
|    Obama Tells Military To Fire On Ame to All    |
|    Kathleen Sebelius' Illegal Campaign Trip    |
|    02 May 13 06:58:33    |
      XPost: dc.urban-planning, wa.politics       From: impeach_obama@yahoo.com              Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius violated       federal law by campaigning for President Obama on the taxpayers’       dime, but now that initial violation has the Democratic National       Committee and an HHS aide in the spotlight for related alleged       infractions.              A nonprofit government watchdog filed a complaint alleging that       the DNC violated campaign finance law by misreporting the money       it spent to reimburse HHS for Sebelius’ trip in a way that       masked the fact that the Hatch Act, a ban on political       campaigning by government employees working in their official       capacity, had been violated.              “The DNC described the purpose of the expenditure as simply as       ‘travel,’ thereby avoiding any acknowledgement that the purpose       of the expenditure was to reimburse the federal government for       Secretary Sebelius’ Hatch Act violation,” Cause of Action       explained in a complaint to the Federal Elections Commission.              If the DNC had described properly the expenditures, which were       paid out in April and August of 2012, it would have implicitly       admitted that the law had been broken even before the Office of       Special Counsel concluded its investigation into Sebelius’ trip       to North Carolina, where she spoke at the Human Rights Campaign       Gala. Sebelius attended the gala on official business, but added       extemporaneous remarks in support of President Obama and a       Democratic gubernatorial candidate.              “Not only is it that the DNC is not being transparent about what       it’s using its funds for reimbursement of, but it’s also       violating the intent and letter of the Federal Elections       Campaign Act,” Cause of Action’s Dan Epstein said in a phone       interview with The Washington Examiner. “Whether it’s to cover       up the Hatch Act violation or to just not properly report it,       it’s very clear that it’s not properly reported — [for] the       reason why, one would have to look into the minds of the lawyers       at the DNC.”              Epstein floated the idea that the DNC reimbursed HHS (rather       than the Treasury Department) and classified it as travel,       rather than as a reimbursement for an independent expenditure in       order to avoid the appearance that the Treasury Department had       effectively loaned money to the Obama campaign for the trip       (which would be another violation of federal law, he said).              Cause of Action also noted another wrinkle: HHS’       reclassification of the trip as a campaign trip means that A.J.       Pearlman, the adviser who traveled to the event with Sebelius,       also violated the Hatch Act.              “That assistant’s participation in the event in North Carolina       would in fact be a Hatch Act violation,” Cause of Action said in       another complaint to the Office of Special Counsel.              Cause of Action blamed Obama and Sebelius for compromising       Pearlman. “The consequence here is that A.J. Pearlman is thrown       under the bus by Sebelius. Sebelius asked the DNC to reimburse       HHS for A.J. Pearlman’s activities, which basically [means] A.J.       Pearlman violated the Hatch Act, which means A.J. Pearlman needs       to be disciplined, most likely fired,” Epstein explained. “Even       though she didn’t intend to engage in any political activity,       she was just doing what she was told.”              An OSC spokesperson said it could not comment on the Hatch Act       complaint, due to privacy laws.              http://washingtonexaminer.com/complaint-sebelius-illegal-       campaign-trip-for-obama-worse-than-we-thought/article/2520096              --       Are you obligated as an armed civilian, to defend unarmed       liberals while you are both under fire by foreign agents of the       outlaw Obama administration?              No. Shoot the liberals immediately so they can't stab you in       the back while you are defending yourself, then return a       controlled rate of aimed fire.                              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca