Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.general    |    More than just amusing South Park antics    |    76,942 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 76,222 of 76,942    |
|    Obama Tells Military To Fire On Ame to All    |
|    Political Corruption at CBS News?    |
|    07 May 13 03:47:34    |
      XPost: dc.urban-planning, wa.politics       From: impeach_obama@yahoo.com              Charles Osgood, the host of CBS Sunday Morning, shocked many       viewers when he introduced a segment that called for the       abolishment of the U.S. Constitution.              “Is the U.S. Constitution truly worthy of the reverence in which       most Americans hold it,” Osgood asked his viewers.              He then introduced Georgetown University Professor Louis Michael       Seidman — who launched into a lengthy essay bashing the Founding       Fathers and the Constitution.              “I’ve got a simple idea: Let’s give up on the Constitution,” he       said.              Seidman is a professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown. He       said Constitutional disobedience is “as American as apple pie.”              “If we are to take back our own country, we have to start making       decisions for ourselves, and stop deferring to an ancient and       outdated document,” he said.              The segment ended without any objections from Osgood.              (CBS News) Is the U.S. Constitution truly worthy of the       reverence in which most Americans hold it? A view on that from       Louis Michael Seidman, Professor of Constitutional Law at       Georgetown University:              I’ve got a simple idea: Let’s give up on the Constitution.              I know, it sounds radical, but it’s really not. Constitutional       disobedience is as American as apple pie.              For example, most of our greatest Presidents — Jefferson,       Lincoln, Wilson, and both Roosevelts — had doubts about the       Constitution, and many of them disobeyed it when it got in their       way.              To be clear, I don’t think we should give up on everything in       the Constitution. The Constitution has many important and       inspiring provisions, but we should obey these because they are       important and inspiring, not because a bunch of people who are       now long-dead favored them two centuries ago.              Unfortunately, the Constitution also contains some provisions       that are not so inspiring. For example, one allows a       presidential candidate who is rejected by a majority of the       American people to assume office. Suppose that Barack Obama       really wasn’t a natural-born citizen. So what?              Constitutional obedience has a pernicious impact on our       political culture. Take the recent debate about gun control.       None of my friends can believe it, but I happen to be skeptical       of most forms of gun control.              I understand, though, that’s not everyone’s view, and I’m eager       to talk with people who disagree.              But what happens when the issue gets Constitutional-ized? Then       we turn the question over to lawyers, and lawyers do with it       what lawyers do. So instead of talking about whether gun control       makes sense in our country, we talk about what people thought of       it two centuries ago.              Worse yet, talking about gun control in terms of constitutional       obligation needlessly raises the temperature of political       discussion. Instead of a question on policy, about which       reasonable people can disagree, it becomes a test of one’s       commitment to our foundational document and, so, to America       itself.              This is our country. We live in it, and we have a right to the       kind of country we want. We would not allow the French or the       United Nations to rule us, and neither should we allow people       who died over two centuries ago and knew nothing of our country       as it exists today.              If we are to take back our own country, we have to start making       decisions for ourselves, and stop deferring to an ancient and       outdated document.              http://nation.foxnews.com/cbs-news/2013/01/28/political-       corruption-cbs-news              --       Are you obligated as an armed civilian, to defend unarmed       liberals while you are both under fire by foreign agents of the       outlaw Obama administration?              No. Shoot the liberals immediately so they can't stab you in       the back while you are defending yourself, then return a       controlled rate of aimed fire.                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca