XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.drugs.pot, alt.drugs.pot.cultivation   
   From: mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us   
      
   In article <87f7dd6ee6964d34fc0a9aab7be62b63@remailer.org.uk>   
   Nathan Hale  wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:12:32 +0000 (GMT) Cornelis Tromp   
   > >  wrote:   
   > >>The issue under discussion here is the security and suitability of   
   > >>1024 bit keys, not hacking into servers etc..etc..   
   > > You've lost your grip on reality.  The threat of hacking into remailers   
   > > is real, breaking 1k RSA keys on a large scale is fiction.   
   >   
   > RSA key depreciation is an issue that concerns the entire crypto community,   
   > the NIST, and numerous experts.. However it seems that these concerns do   
   > not apply to a hard core of refuseniks entrusted with the operation of   
   > the mixmaster newtork. It's an unimpressive carry on as usual approach.   
   >   
   > Breaking 1024 bit RSA keys a fictitious issue.. of no concern. I would put it   
   > to you that with this casual approach to network security that the mixmaster   
   > network is not fit for purpose in its present configuration.   
      
   Lol!  Another colorado doper has escaped his cage.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)