Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    co.general    |    More than just amusing South Park antics    |    76,942 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 76,679 of 76,942    |
|    Turin Turd to All    |
|    Re: How Homosexualists Redefine Homosexu    |
|    31 Jan 17 13:46:10    |
      XPost: soc.men, alt.society.liberalism, or.politics       XPost: rec.arts.tv       From: dumbfuck@dumbo.com              On 30/01/2017 23:15, & wrote:       >       > fake flooding from drug dealing scum its to hide behind traffic they       > steal your credit card numbers too its from peter j ross greg hall and       > alt usenet kooks report identity thieves and pirates to fbi . i win       >       >       >       > On 01/30/2017 05:59 PM, It's Not Too Late To Stop wrote:       >> 'Homosexual Pedophiles': A Clinical Term       >>       >> The fact is, however, that the terms "homosexual" and "pedophile" are       >> not mutually exclusive: they describe two intersecting types of       >> sexual attraction. Webster's Dictionary defines "homosexual" as       >> someone who is sexually attracted to persons of the same sex.       >> "Pedophile" is defined as "an adult who is sexually attracted to       >> young children." The former definition refers to the gender of the       >> desired sexual object, while the latter refers to the age of the       >> desired sexual object.       >>       >> A male "homosexual pedophile," then, is defined as someone who is       >> generally (but not exclusively, see below) sexually attracted to       >> boys, while a female "homosexual pedophile" is sexually attracted to       >> girls.       >>       >> Furthermore, Herek deceitfully leaves out the salient facts in the       >> Jenny study, which Dailey explains in Footnote 23 of his article:       >>       >> The Jenny study used this narrow profile despite the fact that the       >> study itself found that 22 percent of the perpetrators were of the       >> same sex as the victim. In these cases the molesters clearly engaged       >> in homosexual sexual molestation.       >>       >> Twenty-two percent of the molestations were homosexual, and using a       >> 2% figure for the percentage that homosexuals are of the total       >> population, this would be a ratio of 11 to 1. On a probability basis,       >> homosexuals are 11 times more likely to molest children than       >> heterosexuals. This fits in the low end of most valid statistics on       >> this problem. They generally range from 10 to 30 times. Also these       >> figures are very conservative for two reasons. By far, most of the       >> homosexual molesters are men abusing boys; and sexual abuse of boys       >> is under-reported. And, since there are both men and women in the 2%       >> homosexual category, using 2% is too high for the number of       >> homosexual men. On the under-reporting of sexual abuse by boys, the       >> Dailey article states:       >>       >> Dr. Robert Johnson, in Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, reports:       >> "The vast majority of cases of male sexual molestation is not       >> reported. As a result, these young men keep both the incidents and       >> their feelings to themselves."       >>       >> The Department of Justice report on child sexual exploitation       >> explains why the percentage of boy victims is underestimated:       >> "Adolescent boy victims are highly likely to deny certain types of       >> sexual activity. . . . They are embarrassed and ashamed of their       >> behavior and rightfully believe that society will not understand       >> their victimization. ... No matter what the investigator does, most       >> adolescent boys will deny they were victims."       >>       >> And certainly if the boy does not report the molestation, the       >> molester is not going to. Therefore, a very large number of the       >> homosexual molestations never come to light.       >>       >> On a Marshall, et al, study referred to by Dailey, Herek tries to       >> detract from its relevance by making such statements as:       >>       >> The offenders were not asked their sexual orientation (gay, straight,       >> bisexual) and the paper does not report any information about the       >> nature of the offenders' adult sexual relationships, or even if they       >> had any such relationships.       >>       >> First, the study clearly showed that it was of men who molested boys.       >> This in itself shows that they were homosexual pedophiles. Herek       >> tries to get away form this by his special definitions. The study       >> even went further and showed that the molesters were also "attracted       >> to men of all ages." Herek still tries to argue that even this has no       >> bearing on whether or not they were homosexuals. It certainly can get       >> ridiculous when you abandon common sense. Herek completely ignores       >> another Marshall study referred to by Dailey, where 30% of the male       >> sex offenders admitted to sex with adult males, as well as with the       >> boys they molested.       >>       >> Herek criticizes a study of Bickley & Beech referred to by Dailey.       >> The thrust of the criticism seems to be that there were other studies       >> that were somewhat different, and that the studies had little meaning       >> because they focused only on the sex of the victim, without       >> determining the sex of the offender. However, it has been well       >> established that the vast majority of child molesters are male, so       >> male molestation of boys would be homosexual. However, the tests do       >> concentrate on recidivism, and have no great bearing on the       >> percentages of homosexuals that are sex offenders. On this part I       >> would agree with Herek. But the information does go to show more of       >> the excesses of homosexuals.       >>       >> Dailey referred to some writings of the homosexuals, Jay and Young.       >> The only thing Herek came up with on this was:       >>       >> This book, published nearly 30 years ago by a team of writer-       >> activists, is not a scientific study. The authors' survey methodology       >> is not reported in detail and, because it was a journalistic work,       >> the survey was never subjected to scientific peer review.       >>       >> Herek makes no attempt to refute this significant statement:       >>       >> In The Gay Report, by homosexual researchers Karla Jay and Allen       >> Young, the authors report data showing that 73 percent of homosexuals       >> surveyed had at some time had sex with boys sixteen to nineteen years       >> of age or younger.       >>       >> Significantly, the other statements in Herek's paper indicate that he       >> would not consider the above as child molesting, anyway, because the       >> boys were past puberty. The fact that they may be below the age of       >> consent apparently makes no difference to such people as Herek.       >>       >> Dailey referred to a study by W. D. Erickson, stating:       >>       >> A study of 229 convicted child molesters in Archives of Sexual       >> Behavior found that "eighty-six percent of offenders against males       >> described themselves as homosexual or bisexual."       >>       >> All that Herek could come up with on this was:       >>       >> However, no details are provided about how this information was       >> ascertained, making it difficult to interpret. Nor did the authors       >> report the number of homosexual versus bisexual offenders, a              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca