> Agree. What if AI will be more rational than humans? Then, they may   
   > fail Turing test very well because human judge himself would not be   
   > able to comprehend supreme rationality, and will consider machine   
   > behavior nothing better than random noise.   
      
   I don't see why the human judge would not be able to "comprehend"   
   supreme rationality. In fact, why should the question of comprehension   
   even arise?   
      
   Now perhaps it could be the case that humans would fail the Turing test   
   due to the supreme rationality of the AI. In such a case, the judge   
   would predictably say that the less intelligent agent is the machine,   
   but in this case it is in fact the human.   
      
   [ comp.ai is moderated ... your article may take a while to appear. ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)