Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,072 of 1,954    |
|    Tommy Stromhaug to All    |
|    bayes net problem    |
|    08 Jun 06 00:46:39    |
      From: stromhau@stud.ntnu.no              Hi,              Given tha classical alarm, earthquake, burglary, marycalls and johncalls.       Some sort of drawing below.              My problem is that i want to calculate P(A|M).              I use bayes rule to get ;              P(A|M) = P(M|A)*P(A)/P(M). Because i dont know P(A) i get a problem. I dont       know p(M), but this i could have avoided if i had known P(A).              The first thing on my mind was to calculate P(A) as:              sum P(A,M,J,B,E) where i use all the combinations of(negatet or positive) of       M,J,B,E.              Then i found one solution where P(A) was calculated as              p(A) = p(A | ~B, ~E) p(~B, ~E) + p(A | ~B, E) p(~B, E) + p(A | B, ~E) p(B,       ~E) + p(A | B, E) p(B, E)              My big question is why?              It seems like P(A) is calculated as P(A,E,B)+P(A,-B,-E)+P(A,-B,E)+.......              just what i would have done except that i belived that i had to use P(J) and       P(M) also.              How is it that this is true ?               B E        \ /        \ /        \ /        A        / \        / \        / \        J M              arrows from B to A and from E to A       arrows from A to J and from A to M                            Tommy Stromhaug              [ comp.ai is moderated ... your article may take a while to appear. ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca