Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,135 of 1,954    |
|    Ted Dunning to mathlover    |
|    Re: Possible to Find the Clusters One by    |
|    23 Jul 06 09:29:25    |
      From: ted.dunning@gmail.com              mathlover wrote:       > ... in the problem I am working on simple k-means clustering attains       satisfying quality.       >       > However, because of the very large size of the problem it takes a lot       > of time to find all the clusters (I mean using k-means).              Actually, it sounds like you just need a really fast version of       k-means.              That is much more easily come by than what you are asking for. The       problem is that the positioning of the unwanted clusters helps define       the desired clusters.              Fast k-means algorithms avoid making multiple passes through all of       your data. Instead, they make multiple passes through a subset of the       data (a randomized subset, of course) until the cluster centroids are       fairly well defined and then they simply classify the remaining data       points by making a single pass through them.              Also, if you really have a large data set then you probably don't have       to cluster all of your data to find the clusters of interest. A subset       should do as well.              [ comp.ai is moderated ... your article may take a while to appear. ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca