Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,263 of 1,954    |
|    jd to Dustan    |
|    Re: newbie to group: Latest in Conversat    |
|    14 Dec 06 06:16:31    |
      From: jdorrington@hotmail.com              Dustan wrote:       > Or some other technical title describing programs that attempt to       > vaguely lead a conversation.       >       > First of all, a disclaimer: I've only just come across this group, and       > I have no idea what the ethics or rules of this group are. Also, I'm       > sure I sound pretty demanding in my message, but what I'm explaining is       > not a requirement; it is simply what's on my mind and would be really       > cool if I could see something along these lines. Any programs along the       > lines of AI, as long as it's within my reach (I can't say I'm great       > with following directions), would be nice. I have written "I would like       > to see..." (or something to that effect) in front of many of my       > sentences below. Imagine that is written in front of all of the       > sentences. So, answers for the newbie?       >       > I would be very interested to see what kinds of programs exist along       > these lines, what they can do, etc.       >       > It would be really cool to see a program that can attempt to vaguely       > lead a conversation with a human being (most likely with text input; I       > can't imagine that anything resembling HAL exists today; possibly an       > underestimation on my part).              Do some googling for 'loebner prize'. In laymans terms it's a prize for       the computer program that can most closely mimic a human in terms of       responses to questions and general conversion. (Actually it's a bit       more than that, do a google for 'turing test' to know more.)              Most of the entries to the competition are available online (to       converse with rather than with freely available source code).              > It would also be interesting (though not as much so) to see two       > Artificially Intelligent bots interact with full-fledged English       > sentences (again, text input is more likely, as far as I can tell). No       > cheating here! Plain text input ONLY!       >       > (In an OOP program, for example, you have to call an object method for       > sending a message with only the text input as an argument, and only       > that same object method, no matter what the general subject of the text       > input, whatever the sentence structure may be, etc. In programs that       > follow different structures than OOP, similar limitations would have to       > be placed)       >       > I have a decent amount of experience with python, some experience with       > java, and extremely limited experience with C++, so I would like to be       > able to see some open-source projects in those languages.              Try sourceforge, or perhaps do a search for 'Eliza', the source code of       which is available in several languages. Also make sure you read up on       why 'Eliza'-style AI is so heavily criticised.              If you know Python I'd suggest you do some searches for Natural       Language Parsing, or perhaps visit the group down the hall:       comp.ai.nat-lang .              > Can anyone enlighten me?       >              [ comp.ai is moderated ... your article may take a while to appear. ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca