Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,325 of 1,954    |
|    jonesrob@emporia.edu to All    |
|    With vector utility is one less likely t    |
|    15 Mar 07 10:37:36    |
      In conventional capitalist economics one assumes value       monism and a scalar utility (AIMA, Russell and Norvig,       First edition, pgs 473-484, Prentice Hall, 1995). For an       AI this might be something like U = (N-1)/L where N are       the number of offspring (diskcopes) the AI has and L is       its lifespan. (Perhaps a virus-AI living on the web.)       It may be, however, that value monism is wrong and we       can not reduce all rewards to a single scalar (Decisions       with multiple objectives, Keeney and Raiffa, pg 569,       John Wiley, 1976). In this case a vector utility may be       required, something like U vector = ( L, N) where L and       N are now vector components. Performance evaluation       using a vector utility has been employed in my Asa H       experiment (R. Jones, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., vol.       109, no. 3/4, pg164, 2006) and (Multiobjective Heuristic       Search, Dasgupta, Chakrabarti, and DeSarkar, Vieweg       1999). Initial results suggest that use of a vector utility       may make the system less likely of get stuck in local       maxima. If the system can not improve L, for example,       it may be able to increase N. After evolving for a while       one may then find L and N can both improve.              [ comp.ai is moderated ... your article may take a while to appear. ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca