Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,411 of 1,954    |
|    Terje Mathisen to Ted Dunning    |
|    Re: Solving arbitrarily large problems w    |
|    07 May 07 09:32:09    |
      XPost: comp.parallel, comp.sys.super       From: terje.mathisen@hda.hydro.com              Ted Dunning wrote:       > Sorry to rain on your parade. It is really exciting to have ideas       > like this. The trick is to savor the euphoric moments, even with ones       > that turn out not as good as they seem at first and avoid being too       > depressed by the downturn that you experience when they turn out not       > so good. The only way to have good ideas is to have lots of bad ones       > as well (and then prune efficiently).              Hear, hear!              This is _very_ true: Nearly all the really good programmers I've met       love trying all sorts of stuff, then testing/measuring the actual       results they get.              John Carmack (of id Software/Doom/Quake fame) have done an awful lot of       this.              Personally I had a great idea for HD-DVD decoding a few months ago; I       realized that I could decode up to 22-bit long tokens using a single       reciprocal multiplication which emulated a binary division loop.              When I managed to implement it, it turned out that at least on my sample       videos, the average length of such tokens were just one or two bits, so       the bit-serial loop was faster than my beautiful branchless code. :-(              Terje              --       - |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca