Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 21 of 1,954    |
|    Randolph M. Jones to Allan Bruce    |
|    Re: Why are Neural Nets not AI?    |
|    30 Jul 03 03:14:48    |
      From: rjones@colby.edu              Allan Bruce wrote:       > Hi there,       >       > I made an appointment to see one of my lecturers a few days back and said it       > was going to be about AI. When I got there, I aske dhim about Neural Nets       > and he told me that NNs are not considered a branch of AI.       > I didnt want to disagree but he did not explain why. Could someone please       > elaborate and explain why NNs are not considered a bramch of AI?              Many people consider NNs to be part of AI. So you'd probably have to       ask him.              [ comp.ai is moderated. To submit, just post and be patient, or if ]       [ that fails mail your article to |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca