Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 362 of 1,954    |
|    Mark Maloof to All    |
|    Re: committees of experts    |
|    04 Jul 04 01:11:06    |
      From: markmaloof@mail.com              Taking a weighted majority vote is only part of it. Littlestone's       Weighted Majority algorithm predicts based on a weighted majority of the       expert predictions, but it also decreases the weights of experts that predict       incorrectly.              We have to be a little careful about what it means to be "an expert in one's       field." Most learning algorithms that you'd use for experts assume that       future observations will be drawn from the same distribution as those       examples on which they were trained.              However, you might want to check out Avrim Blum's follow up to Littlestone's       work. He used pairs and triplets of features as experts, so depending on       your definition of an expert's field and how far you want to take that       analogy, Blum's experts were experts and specialists in different regions       of the representation space. For example, one useful expert might be good       at making predictions using color and shape, while another might be good       using size and weight.              We've looked at how to dynamically add and remove experts for problems       involving patterns that change over time (aka concept drift).              Hope this helps.              Mark              [ comp.ai is moderated. To submit, just post and be patient, or if ]       [ that fails mail your article to |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca