Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 489 of 1,954    |
|    Aleks Jakulin to Gernot Hoffmann    |
|    Re: The artificial sense of aesthetics    |
|    14 Nov 04 22:24:47    |
      XPost: comp.ai.neural-nets, comp.graphics.algorithms       From: "a_jakulin@"@hotmail.com              Gernot Hoffmann wrote:       > I think your approach has really nothing to do with aesthetics.       > But with artificial intelligence - find plausible interpretations       > input data, based on some assumptions like 'isolated line segments       > should be connected' or 'nearly parallel lines should be parallel',       > or 'nearly straight lines should be straight lines'.              You are quite right. Being situated in AI, and putting 15% of the work       into aesthetic considerations makes me feel that it is mostly       aesthetics, but when you go out of your little field, you're quickly       reminded otherwise. That's the bane of interdisciplinarity.              Aesthetics is a much wider term than what we were doing. Indeed, we       were doing pattern recognition. Finding plausible explanations for       data can be seen as pattern recognition. With the Bayes rule:              P(Explanation | Data) = P(Explanation) P(Data | Explanation) / P(Data)              P(Explanation) - prior       P(Explanation | Data) - posterior       P(Data | Explanation) - likelihood of the explanation       P(Data) - evidence              The prior - P(Explanation) - is the key here. It must be constructed,       and it may be subjective. It is the formalization of the assumptions       you list above. Therefore, pattern recognition cannot be independent       from an aesthetically-informed prior when the Explanations are       diagrams.              So, pattern recognition can be aesthetically-informed. Of course this       is narrower than aesthetics as a whole.              > 'Informations-Aesthetik' was a major issue about 40 years ago, when       > computer graphics started.       > Key words for a Google Search: 'Max Bense', 'Rul Gunzenhaeuser'.              Very useful - thanks. Max Bense defines aesthetics through information       theory:       aesthetics = redundancy / information              Anyway, my previous knowledge about aesthetics was based on how it's       presented in information visualization, not in computer graphics. For       example, see "Graph Drawing:past - present - future"       (http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~gfarr/research/GraphDrawing02-Mel.ppt)              --       mag. Aleks Jakulin       http://www.ailab.si/aleks/       Artificial Intelligence Laboratory,       Faculty of Computer and Information Science,       University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.              [ comp.ai is moderated. To submit, just post and be patient, or if ]       [ that fails mail your article to |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca