Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 495 of 1,954    |
|    Elpico to All    |
|    Rules engine performance is my biggest i    |
|    20 Nov 04 05:48:43    |
      From: kevin.m.walsh@gmail.com              Hi all,              I'm investigating whether rules engines would solve a problem within       my company. We're a large financial institute, and the existing rules       are hard-coded bits of C and assembler (nice) compiled and run on a       IBM mainframe.              Biggest problem for us obviously is the time taken to       update/change/modify rules - currently weeks/months. Now, we are       currently looking to migrate a large chunk of or core processing       systems, but without affecting the performance (peak processing of       approx 7000 transactions per second, with an estimated rule base of       1500 - we're still investigating the complexity of the rules (depth,       rule-fire ratio, etc).              We're looking at existing systems vs developing our own solution, and       was wondering if anyone had any suggestion on products that could       perform.              Given that the data is constantly changing and the partial rule       matching will be low, will the rete alogorithm (for example) be       redundant in our case? Any suggestions on alternative       approaches/products?              Cheers,       Elpico.              [ comp.ai is moderated. To submit, just post and be patient, or if ]       [ that fails mail your article to |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca