Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 515 of 1,954    |
|    examachine@gmail.com to All    |
|    How to name your AI algorithm    |
|    11 Dec 04 00:03:20    |
      For a lighter subject than the usual.              What do you name your AI algorithms after?              Do you try to summarize its functionality in the name, use a       mythological reference, or come up with one of those mysterious       abbreviations like Patricia, etc.? (No, that's not how I want to       immortalize my beloved's name)              What has been the historical tendency? For instance, why is A* search       named the way it has been and not something else?              In data mining, which is the field I work in, there are some quite       interesting names like Apriori, Eclat, Clouds, etc. It seems as if       finding a good mnemonic helps spread the word. What do you think is the       best practice in this? Some papers don't give a name to the algorithms       described, could this have an adverse affect on your "marketing       strategy"?              Cheers,              --       Eray Ozkural              [ comp.ai is moderated. To submit, just post and be patient, or if ]       [ that fails mail your article to |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca