Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 518 of 1,954    |
|    kirtu@earthlink.net to Antonio Jimeno    |
|    Re: Theory refinement and incompleteness    |
|    15 Dec 04 20:22:37    |
      Antonio Jimeno wrote:       >       > I am trying to find papers about theory refinement, more precisely       > related on the possibility of finding incompleteness in my domain       > theory when I am trying to solve a problem. I have found papers from       > different people but those are 10 years old. Do you have references       > to more up to date papers?              There is the ongoing work by Tecuci, et al , at George Mason University       using the Disciple Apprentice learning system. This is not about       theory refinement in general but focuses on refining a particular       ontology and particular tasks in a specific domain. The refinement       process forces the user to update the ontology as Disciple generates       correct and incorrect rules based on examples presented to the system.       The user also explains why some of the generated rules are incorrect,       etc. This kind of cooperative refinement results in an increasingly       correct (but still possibly incomplete) and potentially reusable       ontology while the rules generated from task decomposition apply to the       specific problems of concern to the user.              Kirt Undercoffer              [ comp.ai is moderated. To submit, just post and be patient, or if ]       [ that fails mail your article to |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca