Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai    |    Awaiting the gospel from Sarah Connor    |    1,954 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 838 of 1,954    |
|    Ted Dunning to All    |
|    Re: Category theory and AI - anyone else    |
|    14 Nov 05 00:05:23    |
      From: ted.dunning@gmail.com              The rule of experience is that AI systems do not live or die based on       their theoretical foundations, but rather on how many man-centuries are       invested in creating them.              There are some notable exceptions where limited learning techniques       such as data-mining are appropriate. In those situations, using       symbolic AI of almost any sort chains you to an unmaintainable morass       of a system (except in the special case of a limited set of heuristics       for variable creation and a few business rules for output       interpretation).              Category theory is very unlikely to actually provide much insight into       building real systems precisely because it is so meta-theoretical. The       basic problem is that cognition doesn't appear to be all that much like       physics.              [ comp.ai is moderated. To submit, just post and be patient, or if ]       [ that fails mail your article to |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca