Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.fuzzy    |    Fuzzy logic... all warm and fuzzy-like    |    1,275 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 221 of 1,275    |
|    Nuptek Systems Ltd.)" |
|    When not to use fuzzy systems (Re: A sim    |
|    16 Apr 04 21:50:55    |
      From: @              Luko wrote:              > Come back to the first question.       >       > Where and why not use fuzzy?       >       > I can use it in deterministic or stochastic cases, and then where do i       > can't?       >       > Luko       >       >              Hi:              In general, I do not use fuzzy logic whenever I have or I can derive       an equation or a set of equations expressing the relationship between       input and output variables. This does not mean that I actually implement       the system as an equation or a set of equations. In real-time embedded       systems where the requested response time is very difficult to achieve,       I prefer to replace the equation(s) with one or more look-up tables.              There is a caveat associated with what I wrote: the case in which small       errors in reading input variables result in major erroneous swings of       the output. In this case, normally, I first try to make sure I minimize       errors in reading input variables. Depending on the physical system,       there are various things I can do, i.e. time filtering, etc. In the case       in which this is difficult, I can still use a fuzzy system, as fuzzy       system can be designed to exhibit better error/fault tolerance. Maybe,       I should not say "better", but I should say that they are easier to       design with error/fault tolerance.              As a general issue, not related just to fuzzy systems, "When the only       tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail".              I do not claim to have answered the question. There are other cases       when in which maybe I would not use fuzzy system. This is the most       obvious.              The best approach to problem solving is to have a wide toolbox, with       as many tools as possible, at least IMHO              Ciao              Bruno Di Stefano       fuzzy.logic.nuptek@sympatico.ca              --       -- Bruno Di Stefano ----------------------------------------       Business: nuptek@sympatico.ca www3.sympatico.ca/nuptek       UofT: bruno@ecf.toronto.edu www.ecf.toronto.edu/~bruno       IEEE: b.distefano@ieee.org       ________________________________________________________________________              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca