Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.fuzzy    |    Fuzzy logic... all warm and fuzzy-like    |    1,275 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 336 of 1,275    |
|    Dmitry A. Kazakov to Nico du Bois    |
|    Re: Ratio of Two Fuzzy Matrix    |
|    29 Sep 04 10:59:23    |
      From: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de              Hi Nico!              On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:28:18 +0200, Nico du Bois wrote:              > Can you please give some more explenation? Now its like your saying that all       > fuzzy numbers "x" are the same, because the singleton "x" is the same. I'm       > sure I must be missing something.              I meant the following. Let's consider for simplicity intervals (they are       examples of fuzzy numbers with a rectangular membership function):              Let              a = [1,2]              then              a/a = [1,2] * [0.5,1] = [min(0.5,1,1,2), max(0.5,1,1,2)] = [0.5,2]              So a/a is not the singleton [1,1], but [1,1] is a true subset of [0.5,2].              This result can be deduced from Zadeh's extension principle, I think.       Further, I believe it should hold for all alpha cuts, not just for ones at       the level of truth = 1.              BTW, the result above could be improved, should we take into account       dependence of arguments. Compare:              [1,2] + [1,2] = [1,4]              but              [1,2] * 2 = [2,4]              The second is better because it "knows" that [1,2] is the same thing. We       could have the same result for [1,2]+[1,2] if the joint membership function       of arguments were diagonal and not just min, as it is for independent       arguments.              If we do this thing with a/a considering them dependent, then the result       will be:              (a/a)(x) =              = Sup a(y,z) =       y,z|y/z=x              = Sup 1 =       y,z|y/z=x & y=z              = 1 iff x=1              i.e. a/a will be exact 1.              Unfortunately, in general case we never know...              With matrices the situation is exactly same. We can be sure that thank to       Zadeh's extension principle the result is always correct, but it may get       blurred.              --       Regards,       Dmitry A. Kazakov       http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca